‘The Five’ reacts to Trump’s New York court victory

Fox News
25 Mar 202412:31

Summary

TLDRNew York's efforts to seize Donald Trump's building encountered a significant obstacle when an appeals court reduced a staggering $450 million bond to a $175 million judgment, with Trump given 10 days to pay to prevent Attorney General Letitia James from seizing his assets. Concurrently, Trump faces a hush money trial set to start on April 15, marking him as the first presidential candidate to be on trial while campaigning. The legal battles have ignited fierce debates, with Trump criticizing the cases as election interference and a misuse of government power, while Democrats express outrage over the reduced bond, viewing it as an example of a dual justice system favoring Trump. This situation unfolds amidst other legal challenges and public controversies surrounding Trump.

Takeaways

  • 📊 An appeals court significantly reduced the bond amount required from Donald Trump from $450 million to $175 million, relating to New York's plan to seize his building.
  • 🗞️ Trump has a 10-day window to pay the lowered bond amount to prevent Attorney General Letitia James from seizing his assets.
  • 📝 While dealing with the bond issue, Trump is also facing a separate hush money trial set to start on April 15, making him the first presidential candidate to be on trial while campaigning.
  • 🧐 Trump criticized the criminal cases against him as election interference and labeled the case involving the bond as a scam, sham, and hoax.
  • 😡 Democrats expressed frustration over the decreased bond, seeing it as Trump receiving a favorable treatment unlike others, suggesting a two-tier justice system.
  • 📚 Judge Pirro commented on the bond reduction as reasonable and criticized the initial $450 million amount as baseless, comparing Trump’s bond situation with other high-profile cases.
  • 🚫 Discussions in the script touched on perceived biases in the legal system and the impact of such high-profile legal battles on public opinion and the justice system itself.
  • 💰 Greg Gutfeld questioned the rationale behind the outrage over the bond reduction, suggesting it stems from an obsession with Trump rather than principle.
  • 💼 Jessica Tarlov argued that public perception might not favor Trump, even if he sees the legal challenges as potentially boosting his popularity.
  • 🧹 The debate also covered broader themes of legal precedents, potential impacts on the real estate industry, and the politicization of legal processes.

Q & A

  • What was the original bond amount set for Donald Trump in New York's plan to seize his building, and to what amount was it reduced?

    -The original bond amount was set at $450 million, and it was reduced to $175 million.

  • Why does Donald Trump have 10 days to pay the reduced bond amount?

    -Donald Trump has 10 days to pay the reduced bond amount to stop Attorney General Letitia James from seizing his assets.

  • What is the significance of the hush money trial's start date for Donald Trump?

    -The hush money trial's start date on April 15th is significant because it means Trump will be the first presidential candidate on trial while campaigning.

  • How did Donald Trump describe the criminal cases against him?

    -Donald Trump slammed the criminal cases against him as election interference and described the case as a scam, a sham, and a hoax.

  • What was the reaction of Democrats to the decreased bond amount in Trump's case?

    -Democrats who were once thrilled about the prospect of Trump surrendering his assets were fuming over the decreased bond, describing it as infuriating and an absolute travesty, indicating a two-tiered system of justice.

  • What did Judge Pirro say about the connection between the original $475 million bond and its justification?

    -Judge Pirro argued there was absolutely no connection between the $475 million bond and any justifiable reason, implying it was an arbitrary decision by the judge influenced by bias against Trump.

  • How did the bond amounts for Sam Bankman-Fried and Bernie Madoff compare to Donald Trump's original bond amount?

    -Sam Bankman-Fried's bond was set at $250 million with a million victims, and Bernie Madoff's bond was $10 million with 40,000 victims, contrasting sharply with Donald Trump's original half-billion-dollar bond with no victims.

  • What does Greg Gutfeld imply about the nature of the bond and its impact on real estate investment?

    -Greg Gutfeld implies that the bond was not based on thoughtful, reasoned penalties but was instead manipulated for political reasons, which could have long-lasting negative consequences on real estate investment in the city.

  • How does Jessica Tarlov's perspective differ regarding the bond reduction and justice?

    -Jessica Tarlov suggests that the outrage over the bond reduction stems from a perception of a two-tiered system of justice, where no other person but Donald Trump would have had their bond amount lowered that much, highlighting concerns over unequal treatment.

  • What is the main argument presented by those critical of the actions against Trump in the script?

    -The main argument presented by critics is that the legal actions against Trump, including the unprecedented bond amount and seizure of assets, are politically motivated attempts to interfere with the election and undermine him, rather than being based on fair legal standards.

Outlines

00:00

🚧 Trump's Legal Battles and Public Reaction

An appeals court significantly reduced the bond amount in a case against Donald Trump from $450 million to $175 million, giving him 10 days to pay to prevent asset seizure by Attorney General Letitia James. This development coincided with a separate ruling that Trump's hush money trial will start on April 15, making him the first presidential candidate to be on trial while campaigning. Trump criticized the cases against him as election interference, framing them as a weaponization of the government. The reduction in bond amount has sparked outrage among Democrats, who see it as a preferential treatment and an abuse of the justice system. The segment also touches on a prosecutor's personal scandal and the comparison of Trump's bond to other high-profile cases, arguing that Trump faces an unjustly high bond despite having no direct victims. The narrative underscores the deep political divisions and the contentious nature of Trump's legal challenges.

05:00

🔍 Perspectives on Trump's Financial and Legal Strategy

The discussion shifts to varying opinions on the implications of Trump's legal and financial maneuvers. Critics argue that the reduced bond amount reflects a two-tier justice system favoring Trump, while his supporters see it as a win against biased legal actions. Trump himself downplays the financial impact, boasting about his ability to cover the bond and suggesting that legal battles could boost his popularity. The segment debates the strategic motivations behind the lawsuits, with some viewing them as attempts to influence the upcoming election rather than pursue justice. The conversation also touches on the broader implications for the real estate industry and the potential chilling effect on investment in cities where such legal precedents are set. Overall, the dialogue captures the complex interplay between politics, justice, and public opinion in the context of Trump's ongoing legal challenges.

10:02

🎭 The Political and Public Divide Over Trump's Trials

The third segment delves into the polarized public and political reactions to Donald Trump's legal challenges, highlighting the intensity of feelings on both sides. Supporters of Trump argue that the legal actions against him are politically motivated attempts to prevent his re-election, while his critics believe they are necessary to hold him accountable for alleged wrongdoings. The discussion emphasizes the stark contrast in how different segments of the population perceive justice and fairness, especially in the context of high-profile political figures. There's also mention of the impact these trials could have on Trump's political future, with some arguing that being a convicted felon could harm his chances in the election, despite Trump's belief to the contrary. The segment underscores the deep divisions in American society over Trump's presidency and legal issues, as well as the broader implications for the rule of law and democratic processes.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Appeals Court

An appeals court is a higher court that reviews the decisions of lower courts to ensure the law was applied correctly. In the context of the video, the appeals court significantly reduced a financial bond set against Donald Trump from $450 million to $175 million. This action was a critical development in the legal proceedings, highlighting the appeals court's role in modifying judicial decisions that it deems excessive or unjust.

💡Bond Reduction

Bond reduction refers to the lowering of a monetary amount required to be paid as a condition for a legal benefit, such as avoiding asset seizure. In the video, Donald Trump's bond was reduced from $450 million to $175 million by an appeals court, which is a pivotal moment illustrating the legal system's checks and balances, and its impact on the proceedings against Trump.

💡Attorney General Letitia James

Letitia James is the Attorney General of New York, mentioned in the video as attempting to seize Trump's assets. Her actions represent the legal challenges Trump faces and underscore the broader theme of political and legal battles involving high-profile figures. James' role is critical in the narrative, demonstrating the state's active legal stance against Trump.

💡Hush Money Trial

The hush money trial refers to legal proceedings against Donald Trump concerning payments made to silence allegations that could have affected his presidential campaign. The video mentions that a judge ruled this trial would start on April 15, making Trump the first presidential candidate on trial while campaigning. This event underscores the intersection of law, politics, and public perception.

💡Election Interference

Election interference involves actions designed to influence or disrupt the electoral process. Trump criticizes the criminal cases against him as election interference, suggesting these legal challenges are attempts to undermine his political campaign. This term encapsulates Trump's portrayal of himself as a victim of politicized justice, aiming to rally support by framing his legal battles as politically motivated attacks.

💡Asset Seizure

Asset seizure is the process by which authorities take possession of properties as part of legal proceedings. The video mentions Attorney General Letitia James' plan to seize Trump's assets, a significant legal maneuver indicating the severity of the allegations against Trump and the potential consequences of the legal battle.

💡Sam Bankman-Fried

Sam Bankman-Fried is referenced by Judge Pirro as a comparison to Trump's situation, highlighting the bond amounts set in high-profile cases. Bankman-Fried, associated with a significant financial scandal, had his bond set at $250 million, which Pirro uses to argue the disproportionality of Trump's initially set bond. This comparison serves to criticize the legal system's consistency and fairness.

💡Bernie Madoff

Bernie Madoff, whose bond was $10 million, is mentioned as part of a broader discussion on bond amounts for high-profile individuals. Madoff's case, involving a massive Ponzi scheme, is used to illustrate the argument that the bond set for Trump was excessively high in comparison, highlighting discrepancies in how the legal system handles different cases.

💡Real Estate Industry

The real estate industry is mentioned in the context of discussing the potential consequences of legal actions against Trump on his business interests. The video suggests that the unprecedented nature of the legal challenges could have lasting impacts on the willingness of investors to engage in the New York real estate market, pointing to broader economic implications.

💡Two-Tiered System of Justice

This concept is debated in the video, with some commentators suggesting that the reduction of Trump's bond amount is indicative of a justice system that operates differently for the wealthy or powerful. The term captures a critical theme of the discussion, which revolves around perceptions of fairness and equality before the law, especially in high-profile cases.

Highlights

New York's plan to seize Trump's building runs into a major roadblock as an appeals court slashes a $450 million bond to $175 million.

Trump has 10 days to pay the lower amount to stop Attorney General Letitia James from seizing his assets.

Trump's hush money trial is set to start April 15, making him the first presidential candidate on trial while campaigning.

Trump criticizes the criminal cases against him as election interference.

Democrats express frustration over the decreased bond amount, seeing it as a private system of justice for Trump.

Judge Pirro defends the reduced bond amount as appropriate, criticizing the initial $475 million as disconnected from reality.

Comparison of bond amounts: Sam Bankman-Fried's $250 million vs. Bernie Madoff's $10 million, highlighting the discrepancy with Trump's case.

Judge Pirro argues that the business records case against Trump, set for April 15, lacks basis and credible witnesses.

The discussion includes a Supreme Court decision against a biased indictment and critique of the legal process against Trump.

Greg Gutfeld comments on the public's emotional reactions to Trump's legal situation and the unprecedented nature of the case.

Jessica Tarlov argues that the lowered bond exemplifies a two-tiered system of justice, privileging Trump.

Gutfeld and Tarlov debate Trump's impact on real estate and his contributions to the economy versus allegations against him.

The panel discusses the broader implications of the legal actions against Trump for real estate investment and justice.

Concerns are raised about the precedent set by using legal mechanisms in a way perceived as targeting a political figure.

The debate touches on Trump's potential popularity gain from his legal challenges and the political motivations behind the cases.

Transcripts

00:00

♪ ♪

00:09

[INDISTINCT]

00:09

>> Dana: NEW YORK'S PLAN TO

00:12

SEIZE TRUMP'S BUILDING RUNNING

00:13

INTO A MAJOR ROADBLOCK.

00:15

AN APPEALS COURT FLASHED A

00:17

STAGGERING $450 MILLION BOND TO

00:21

$175 MILLION JUDGMENT.

00:23

HE HAS 10 DAYS TO PAY THE LOWER

00:26

AMOUNT IN ORDER TO STOP

00:27

ATTORNEY GENERAL LETITIA JAMES

00:29

FROM SEIZING HIS ASSETS.

00:30

THAT'LL HAPPENING WHILE TRUMP

00:31

WAS IN A DIFFERENT COURTROOM

00:33

TODAY.

00:33

A JUDGE RULING HIS HUSH MONEY

00:35

TRIAL WILL START APRIL 15TH,

00:36

MEANING TRUMP WILL BE THE FIRST

00:38

PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE ON TRIAL

00:41

WHILE CAMPAIGNING.

00:41

TRUMP SLAMMING CRIMINAL CASES

00:45

AGAINST HIM AS ELECTION

00:47

INTERFERENCE.

00:47

>> I RESPECT THE APPELLATE

00:49

DIVISION FOR SUBSTANTIALLY

00:50

REDUCING THEIR RIDICULOUS AMOUNT

00:51

OF MONEY THAT WAS PUT ON BY A

00:53

CORRUPT JUDGE.

00:53

NOT TO BE LOOKED AT IN JAMES NOT

00:55

TO BE LOOKED AT.

00:57

SHE IS LIKE THE PUPPET MASTER OF

00:59

THE JUDGE.

01:00

WE ARE GOING THROUGH THIS

01:01

WEAPONIZATION OF OUR GOVERNMENT

01:02

TO TRY AND KNOCK OUT SOMEBODY'S

01:02

POLITICAL OPPONENT.

01:05

SO FAR BASED ON THE POLLS, IT'S

01:08

NOT WORKING AT ALL.

01:08

THAT CASE IS A SCAM, A SHAM, AND

01:11

A HOAX.

01:12

>> Dana: DEMOCRATS WHO WERE

01:14

ONCE THRILLED ABOUT THE PROSPECT

01:16

OF TRUMP SURRENDERING HIS ASSETS

01:17

FUMING OVER THE DECREASED BOND.

01:20

>> THIS IS SO INFURIATING, I

01:21

DON'T KNOW WHAT TO DO.

01:23

NOW HE'S GETTING HIS OWN PRIVATE

01:24

SYSTEM OF JUSTICE.

01:25

AN ABSOLUTE TRAVESTY.

01:28

>> THIS IS ONE HECK OF A BREAK

01:31

FOR YET AGAIN -- GO >> THE

01:33

PLAYBOOK IS DIFFERENT FOR FORMER

01:35

PRESIDENT TRUMP.

01:35

>> HE HAS PRETTY MUCH GOTTEN

01:38

EVERYTHING IS WANTED.

01:39

>> NO ONE ELSE IN THE COUNTRY

01:40

WOULD HAVE THAT KIND OF LUCK.

01:43

>> Dana: AND MY FAVORITE IS

01:45

BACK AFTER BEING FORCED TO

01:48

DISMISS HER EX-LOVER FROM

01:50

TRUMP'S ELECTION INTERFERENCE

01:51

CASE.

01:51

THE PROSECUTOR SAYS IT IS FULL

01:52

STEAM AHEAD TO GO AFTER TRUMP.

01:54

>> I DON'T FEEL LIKE WE HAVE

01:56

BEEN SLOW DOWN AT ALL.

01:57

I THINK THEIR EFFORTS TO SLOW

01:59

DOWN THIS TRAIN.

01:59

THE TRAIN IS COMING.

02:00

BUT THE RECORD, I'M NOT

02:01

EMBARRASSED BY ANYTHING I HAVE

02:04

DONE.

02:05

YOU KNOW, I GUESS MY GREATEST

02:06

CRIME IS, I HAD A RELATIONSHIP

02:08

WITH A MAN.

02:09

THAT IS NOT SOMETHING I FIND

02:11

EMBARRASSING IN ANY WAY.

02:13

>> Dana: ALL RIGHT, JUDGE.

02:14

THERE'S LOTS TO SHOOT AT HERE.

02:16

TAKE YOUR PICK, WHICH EVERYONE

02:17

YOU WANT.

02:18

>> Judge Pirro: THANK YOU FOR

02:21

THE $175 MILLION BOND -- WHICH

02:23

CERTAINLY IS APPROPRIATE.

02:24

THERE WAS ABSOLUTELY NO

02:26

CONNECTION BETWEEN THE

02:28

$475 MILLION AND I THINK IT IS

02:29

HALF A BILLION DOLLARS AT THIS

02:31

POINT WITH THE INTEREST THAT HE

02:33

PULLED OUT OF THE SKY AND SAID

02:34

I'M GOING TO HIT DONALD TRUMP

02:36

FOR THAT.

02:38

THEY ARE DISAPPOINTED BECAUSE

02:39

THEY WANTED TO CALL HIM BROKE.

02:41

HE'S GOING TO MAKE THAT

02:44

$175 MILLION BOND.

02:45

IN HIS CONDITION OF COURSE UPON

02:48

HIS PERFECTING HIS APPEAL BY

02:49

SEPTEMBER, THAT MEANS HE'S GOT

02:50

TO HAVE ALL HIS APPELLATE WORK

02:53

IN THE APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST

02:54

APARTMENT WHICH RENDER THIS

02:55

DECISION REDUCING THE BOND.

02:56

I WANT TO -- I LOOK THIS UP.

03:00

WHEN SAM BANKMAN-FRIED WHO

03:02

APPARENTLY GONE TO SOMETHING

03:05

LIKE A MILLION DOLLARS OR A

03:08

MILLION VICTIMS, HIS BOND WAS

03:10

$250 MILLION.

03:12

BERNIE MADE OFF AT 40,000

03:15

VICTIMS.

03:16

HIS BOND WAS $10 MILLION.

03:17

DONALD TRUMP, NO VICTIMS, HALF A

03:19

BILLION DOLLARS.

03:20

I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW WHERE THOSE

03:22

PEOPLE FROM THE OTHER STATIONS

03:24

ARE LEARNING THE LAW BUT THEY

03:24

ARE TALKING ABOUT.

03:25

THERE IS NO HARM NO FOUL NIGHT.

03:27

THAT'S THE END OF IT.

03:28

NO ONE RELIED TO THEIR DETRIMENT

03:30

ON ANYTHING.

03:31

NO ONE LOST A DIME.

03:34

DONALD TRUMP IS A WHALE CLIENT.

03:35

EVERYONE WHO COMES IN WITH HIM

03:36

MAKES MONEY WITH HIM.

03:37

THAT'S NUMBER ONE FAN.

03:40

NUMBER 2 ON THE BUSINESS RECORDS

03:41

CASE THAT'S GONNA ON APRIL 15TH,

03:44

THEY'VE GOT A CONVICTED FELON

03:45

WHO WAS A LIAR WHO IS THE MAIN

03:47

WITNESS IN THAT CASE ON THE CASE

03:50

THAT IS LITERALLY WITHOUT BASIS

03:50

BECAUSE THEY TOOK A FELONY

03:55

CHARGE.

03:55

THEY TRIED TO BREATHE LIFE INTO

03:59

A STATUTE OF LIMITATION PAST

04:02

MISDEMEANOR IN NEW YORK THAT

04:04

DIDN'T WANT TO GO ON.

04:09

ALVIN BRAGG DIDN'T WANT TO

04:10

PROSECUTE.

04:11

THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT WOULDN'T

04:13

PROSECUTE AN F D.C. DIDN'T

04:15

PROSECUTE.

04:17

THEY CAME AND BREATHED 8 INTO

04:19

THIS FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORD

04:21

BY BOOTSTRAPPING FROM THE FEDS

04:23

AND PULLING AWAY THE STATUTE OF

04:24

LIMITATIONS IN THE MISDEMEANOR.

04:25

PULLING OUT MICHAEL COHEN TO BE

04:27

THEIR CENTRAL WITNESS.

04:28

IT IS ABSURD.

04:28

THE LAST THING I WANT TO SAY IS

04:31

THIS.

04:33

YOU HAVE A SUPREME COURT WHO

04:34

CAME OUT AS AT THE SECRETARY OF

04:35

STATE AS WELL AS THE

04:38

SUPREME COURT JUSTICE IN

04:39

COLORADO WERE WRONG.

04:40

YOU CAN TAKE THEM OFF THE

04:42

BALLOT.

04:42

THEY SAID TO FANI WILLIS, GET

04:44

RID OF YOUR LOVER.

04:44

YOU CAN'T HAVE HIM ON.

04:46

SIX OF YOUR ACCOUNTS GO BECAUSE

04:47

YOU DON'T KNOW HOW TO DRAFT AN

04:49

INDICTMENT.

04:50

THIS B-17, THEY ARE SAYING YOUR

04:52

BOND IS NOWHERE CONSISTENT WITH

04:53

THE FACTS.

04:53

WE ARE GOING TO TAKE IT DOWN 40

04:58

OR 60%.

04:58

THEY ARE BAD SHAPE ALREADY AND

05:00

IT'S CAN IT CONTINUE THAT WAY.

05:01

THIS IS ALL COMING OUT OF THE

05:04

DEMOCRATS WHO HATE DONALD TRUMP.

05:05

>> Dana: HOW DO YOU SEE ALL

05:07

THIS?

05:09

>> Greg: I LIKE MY SHIRT EVEN

05:11

THOUGH IT LOOKS RATHER STRANGE

05:12

ON TV.

05:12

I LOVE THAT MONTAGE.

05:15

THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO ARE SO

05:17

INFURIATED, THEY DON'T KNOW WHAT

05:19

TO DO.

05:19

SO IN PRETTY RATED, I DON'T KNOW

05:22

WHAT TO DO.

05:23

BECAUSE TRUMP ONLY IS GOING TO

05:26

PONY UP $175 MILLION.

05:27

WHAT KIND OF LIFE DO YOU LEAD,

05:29

YOU KNOW?

05:30

YOU HAVE ANY FRIENDS OR ANY

05:32

FAMILY?

05:33

WHAT KIND OF LONELY EXISTENCE IS

05:34

THIS WHEN YOU DERIVE YOUR

05:36

HAPPINESS OR SORROW BASED ON THE

05:37

TRIALS OF ANOTHER PERSON?

05:41

I CAN'T IMAGINE HOW SMALL THAT

05:42

WORLD IS.

05:42

WHEN I SAW THAT ON MOTION, I

05:44

DON'T EVEN GET THAT MAD.

05:48

AT CRIME SPREE'S.

05:48

I WAS ANGRY BECAUSE THERE WAS

05:50

ACTUAL CRIME.

05:51

OVER SOMEBODY ELSE, IT IS SO

05:53

WEIRD.

05:53

THE BOND WAS BASED NOT ON

05:56

THOUGHTFUL REASONED PENALTIES,

05:58

IT WAS BASED ON WHAT TRUMP WAS

06:00

GOING TO MAKE, HIS PROFIT.

06:02

IT WAS REVERSED ENGINEERED USING

06:03

THE MANIPULATION OF A LAW THAT

06:04

WASN'T USED IN THAT WAY BEFORE.

06:06

THAT IS WHY IT WAS CALLED

06:08

UNPRECEDENTED.

06:08

I STILL WANT TO KNOW WHO HE

06:10

WRITES THE CHECK OUT TO EVEN

06:12

WHERE THIS BOND.

06:13

IF YOU HATE TRUMP, YOU SHOULD

06:16

STILL MAINTAIN A SHRED OF

06:17

PRINCIPLE AND SAY, I DON'T WANT

06:18

THIS GUY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, BUT

06:20

I REALIZE THAT THIS IS, LIKE,

06:22

ILLEGAL, IMMORAL, AND WOULD

06:24

LAUGH LASTING CONSEQUENCES IN

06:27

THE REAL ESTATE INDUSTRY.

06:28

PEOPLE LIKE JAMIE DIMON ARE

06:30

SAYING THAT.

06:31

AND YOU ARE NOT.

06:32

I THINK THE PROBLEM RIGHT NOW

06:34

IS, YOU CAN'T ARGUE WITH AN

06:37

IGNORANT MOB.

06:38

PEOPLE CHEERING THIS ON, THOSE

06:40

PEOPLE YOU SAW HAVE NO IDEA WHAT

06:42

THEY ARE CHEERING.

06:43

THEY HAVE NO IDEA.

06:46

LIKE, WHEN THEY SEE

06:48

"UNPRECEDENTED" IN THE SEIZURE

06:50

OF PRIVATE PROPERTY, THEY DON'T

06:51

THINK, THIS IS WHERE PEOPLE LIVE

06:53

AND WORK.

06:54

THEY DON'T KNOW WHAT THIS IS

06:55

GOING TO INCENTIVIZE WHERE THE

06:57

FUTURE.

06:57

REPUBLICANS ARE GOING TO BE TO

06:59

DO THIS.

07:00

OR DEMOCRATS WILL DO THIS.

07:01

THE PEOPLE IN REAL ESTATE ARE

07:03

NOT GOING TO WANT TO INVEST IN

07:05

THE CITY.

07:05

IF YOU BRING THIS STUFF UP, THEY

07:07

WILL LOOK AT YOU WITH A BLANK

07:08

FACE.

07:10

THEY ARE SOAKED TO THE GILLS

07:11

WITH TDS.

07:12

IT'S LIKE ARGUING WITH A MOB,

07:15

TORCHING AN AUTO ZONE.

07:16

THEY ARE IN THAT MOMENT,

07:18

DESTROYING THAT BUILDING.

07:19

YOU DO REALIZE THAT PEOPLE WORK

07:21

THERE AND, IT'S NOT CAN I HELP

07:23

EVERYBODY LIVING IN THAT AREA.

07:24

THEY DON'T CARE.

07:25

THEY WILL TRASH IT AND PUNCH YOU

07:27

IN THE FACE.

07:27

THAT IS THE MENTALITY.

07:29

>> Dana: WHY WERE THEY SO MAD

07:31

ABOUT THE RULE OF LAW BEING

07:36

FOLLOWED?

07:38

>> Jessica: I DON'T THINK THEY

07:40

WOULD SAY THE RULE OF LAW AS

07:41

BEING FOLLOWED.

07:43

THEY FEEL THAT THIS IS

07:44

ABOUT 2 TEARS OF JUSTICE AND NO

07:45

OTHER PERSON BUT DONALD TRUMP

07:47

WOULD HAVE HAD THE BOND AMOUNT

07:49

LOWER THAT MUCH.

07:50

I KNOW THAT THERE HAVE BEEN

07:55

LARGER BONDS.

07:56

99.9% OF THEM HAVE BEEN TO

07:57

PUBLIC COMPANIES NOT

08:00

INDIVIDUALLY HELD COMPANIES.

08:00

THAT IS THE POINT OF  

08:03

DISTINCTION.

08:04

>> Dana: ISN'T THAT TWO-TIERED

08:05

SYSTEM OF JUSTICE?

08:06

>> Jessica: I AM SAYING WHAT

08:08

THEY WERE ARGUING.

08:09

I HAVE CONSISTENTLY FELT

08:11

UNCOMFORTABLE ABOUT THIS AND

08:12

SAID THIS WAS A DISTRACTION FROM

08:14

THE CASES THAT PEOPLE ARE REALLY

08:15

INTERESTED IN SEEING PLAY OUT

08:16

BEFORE THEY CAST THEIR VOTES IN

08:19

NOVEMBER OR WHENEVER THEIR EARLY

08:20

VOTING PERIOD STARTS.

08:22

IT IS DEFINITELY A WIN FOR

08:24

TRUMP.

08:24

YOU SAW THAT IN HIS PRESS

08:26

CONFERENCE AFTERWARDS WHERE HE

08:27

SAID THE BEAUTIFUL APPELLATE

08:28

DIVISION.

08:28

I'M HAPPY TO PAY THIS.

08:31

I DO STILL THINK THAT THERE WAS

08:32

NO POINT IN HIM BRAGGING

08:35

BEFOREHAND ABOUT HOW HE HAD NO

08:38

MONEY.

08:38

$500 MILLION A FEW DAYS AGO

08:40

BEFORE THAT HE SAID HE HAD

08:43

$400 MILLION IN CASH.

08:44

I GUESS WE WILL NEVER KNOW.

08:45

I THINK HE REALLY GAVE UP THEIR

08:47

GAME AND ONE EXCHANGE WITH A

08:48

REPORTER WHO SAID, ARE YOU

08:50

MARRIED A CONVICTION COULD COST

08:51

YOU THE ELECTION?

08:52

HIS ANSWER WAS, WELL, HE COULD

08:53

ALSO MAKE ME MORE POPULAR.

08:58

I UNDERSTAND HIS THINKING ON

09:00

THAT.

09:02

SURVEY AFTER SURVEY REVEALS THAT

09:03

ISN'T THE CASE.

09:05

NO, HE GAINS POPULARITY.

09:06

HE DID THAT THROUGH THEIR

09:07

PRIMARY PURITY IS OBVIOUSLY

09:09

RUNNING VERY COMPETITIVELY.

09:10

PEOPLE DON'T WANT TO VOTE FOR A

09:12

CONVICTED FELON.

09:13

I THINK HE NEEDS TO BE CAREFUL

09:14

ABOUT THAT.

09:15

HE HAS A LOT OF CASES PENDING

09:17

AGAINST HIM.

09:18

>> Greg: IS THAT THE WHOLE

09:20

POINT OF THIS?

09:21

PEOPLE DON'T VOTE FOR A FELON.

09:24

IT IS A CIRCULAR ARGUMENT.

09:26

>> Jessica: THAT IS MAKING IT

09:28

OUT AS IF THE MAN DIDN'T DO

09:29

ANYTHING WRONG.

09:30

THE AVERAGE REAL ESTATE INVESTOR

09:32

IS INFLATING THE WORTH OF

09:35

THEIR --

09:36

>> Greg: YOU DON'T KNOW

09:37

ANYTHING ABOUT REAL ESTATE,

09:39

JESSICA, YOU RANTS.

09:40

LOOK AT THAT BUILDING.

09:41

TRUMP OWNS THAT BUILDING.

09:45

TRUMP OWNS ALL OF THESE

09:45

BEAUTIFUL PROPERTIES.

09:47

HE HAS BUILT THESE THINGS.

09:51

WHAT HAS JOE BIDEN BUILD?

09:53

JOE BIDEN HAS NOT BUILT

09:55

ANYTHING, JESSICA.

09:56

HE HASN'T EVEN BUILT A CHARGING

09:57

STATION FOR THIS MAN IS

09:59

RESPONSIBLE FOR THOUSANDS OF

10:01

AMERICANS BEING HIRED AND

10:02

MILLIONS OF DOLLARS BEING MADE

10:04

BY BANKS BY INVESTORS IN THIS

10:06

GREAT CITY.

10:07

THE BOOK IN THE BACK SHOT OF

10:09

THAT STUPID FORMER ASSISTANT

10:12

U.S. ATTORNEY, DO YOU KNOW WHAT

10:14

IT SAID?

10:15

TAKING DOWN TRUMP.

10:15

THAT WAS THE BOOK IN HIS LITTLE

10:17

BACK SHOT LIBRARY.

10:19

THIS GUY IS A STRAIGHT PLAYER.

10:20

THESE ARE NOT STRAY PLAYERS.

10:23

THESE ARE HOUNDS, JESSICA.

10:26

A SAVAGE ATTACK ON A MAN,

10:28

BECAUSE THESE PEOPLE ARE

10:29

MENTALLY ILL.

10:30

THEY DON'T WANT TO SEE HIM

10:32

ACTUALLY CONVICTED AT ALL.

10:33

THEY JUST WANT TO SEE HIM

10:34

CONVICTED BEFORE THE ELECTION.

10:36

THEY DON'T CARE WHAT HAPPENS

10:37

AFTER THE ELECTION.

10:38

THAT IS THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS.

10:41

JOE BIDEN HAS UNLEASHED THE

10:42

HOUNDS.

10:44

TALKING ABOUT THE TRAIN.

10:45

COME ON.

10:46

IF YOU TAKE THE TRUMP TRAIN AND

10:48

YOU GO LIKE THIS, MY MONEY IS ON

10:51

THE TRUMP TRAIN.

10:52

REMEMBER AFTER 9/11, JESSICA.

10:56

WE TREATED -- YOUR DEMOCRAT

10:57

LAWYERS FLEW DOWN TO GET TO

11:00

REPRESENT HIM.

11:01

THEY NEED CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

11:03

THEY NEED ALL OF THE RIGHTS THAT

11:05

THEY SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO

11:07

APPEAL, THE RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS

11:08

AND THE RIGHT TO A TRIAL.

11:09

THEY ARE GIVING TERRORISTS MORE

11:12

RESPECT THAN DONALD TRUMP.

11:14

THEY SAID, THIS IS WHAT MAKES

11:16

AMERICA, AMERICA.

11:18

NOW THEY ARE JUST DESTROYING

11:19

THIS MAN.

11:20

THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT PRECEDENT.

11:21

THEY ARE TRYING TO ATTACK HIM

11:24

ANYWAY THEY CAN.

11:26

>> Jessica: DONALD TRUMP

11:28

HAS -- HE THINKS IT IS GREAT

11:29

REPRESENTATION.

11:30

HE HAS GOTTEN ALMOST ALL OF HIS