Sweet Baby Backlash Goes NUCLEAR + Suicide Squad & Spider-Man 2 DESTROYED by Woke Company

ENDYMIONtv
2 Mar 202421:26

Summary

TLDRThe video discusses the backlash against Sweet Baby, a consulting firm promoting inclusivity and diversity in video games, which has been accused of negatively impacting game quality. A Steam curator tool that compiles games worked on by Sweet Baby has gained popularity, leading to the firm's employees attempting to suppress it. The video argues that Sweet Baby's involvement often undermines the representation of straight white male characters and has led to game failures, suggesting that the industry may shift away from such practices due to consumer resistance and the risk of studio closures.

Takeaways

  • 🤬 A culture war is ongoing in the gaming industry, with consumers fighting back against perceived attempts to ruin their favorite games.
  • 🎮 A Steam curator tool was created to compile games worked on by Sweet Baby Inc, a consulting firm promoting inclusivity and diversity in games.
  • 🚫 Sweet Baby Inc's involvement is seen as detrimental to the quality of games, with examples like Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League and Spider-Man games being criticized.
  • 📈 The curator tool gained popularity quickly, with a significant increase in followers, indicating fan support for identifying games associated with Sweet Baby Inc.
  • 💬 Sweet Baby Inc employees, including Chris Kindred and Lego Butts, have publicly opposed the curator tool and encouraged followers to report it.
  • 🛡️ The backlash against Sweet Baby Inc is seen as a defense of gaming culture and a rejection of forced inclusivity at the expense of game quality.
  • 🚨 There is a history of Sweet Baby Inc employees being involved in suppressing free speech and enforcing ideological ideas, dating back to the Gamergate era.
  • 📉 Games associated with Sweet Baby Inc have faced commercial failure, leading to studio closures and job losses.
  • 🔄 The gaming industry may be at a turning point, with a potential shift away from identity politics and a focus on quality and consumer satisfaction.
  • 💥 The public backlash against Sweet Baby Inc could lead to a significant change in the industry, with studios reevaluating their approach to inclusivity and diversity.
  • 🌟 The video script emphasizes the importance of standing up against bullies and not silencing dissenting voices in the gaming community.

Q & A

  • What is the main issue being discussed in the video?

    -The main issue discussed is the cultural war within the gaming industry, particularly the backlash against Sweet Baby Inc, a consulting firm that promotes inclusivity and diversity in video games.

  • What is a Steam curator tool?

    -A Steam curator tool is a filter that helps users find games more effectively on the platform, such as by genre, developer, or other common characteristics.

  • Why are some people upset with Sweet Baby Inc's involvement in video games?

    -Some people believe that Sweet Baby Inc's focus on inclusivity and diversity negatively impacts the quality of games, making them less enjoyable or altering the portrayal of certain characters.

  • What was the reaction to the Steam curator tool that compiled games worked on by Sweet Baby Inc?

    -The curator tool gained popularity quickly, with a significant increase in followers, indicating that many fans were supportive of the tool's purpose to identify and potentially avoid games associated with Sweet Baby Inc.

  • How has Sweet Baby Inc responded to the curator tool and its creator?

    -Sweet Baby Inc has expressed dissatisfaction with the tool and has reportedly tried to have the user who created it banned from Steam, which would also result in the loss of their game library.

  • What is the history of the user known as 'Lego butts' mentioned in the video?

    -Lego butts, whose real name is not provided, is known for being involved in the Gamergate controversy and for his past actions against a charity that aimed to promote women in video games.

  • What is the significance of the user 'Chris Kindred' in this context?

    -Chris Kindred is a consultant at Sweet Baby Inc who has publicly encouraged followers to report the curator tool, hoping to get the user who created it banned from Steam.

  • What are the implications for Sweet Baby Inc if their name becomes associated with game failures?

    -If Sweet Baby Inc's name becomes synonymous with game failures, it could lead to a loss of business as studios and publishers may be less likely to work with them, fearing negative consumer reactions and potential financial losses.

  • What is the video creator's stance on inclusivity in video games?

    -The video creator believes that inclusivity is not inherently bad, but it should not come at the cost of belittling or ruining other groups, which they argue is what Sweet Baby Inc has been doing.

  • What is the video creator's advice to the audience regarding the situation?

    -The video creator encourages the audience not to be silent, to stand up against what they perceive as fanaticism, and to support each other through positive communication and understanding.

Outlines

00:00

🎮 Culture War in the Gaming Industry

The video discusses a significant culture war happening across gaming platforms, highlighting the conflict between consumers who want to preserve the integrity of their favorite games and those who aim to change the industry's direction. The narrative focuses on a Steam curator tool that lists games worked on by Sweet Baby Inc., a consulting firm known for promoting inclusivity and diversity in video games. The creator of the tool is facing backlash from Sweet Baby and others who believe the tool is harmful and want it removed.

05:02

🚀 Rise of the Steam Curator Tool

The curator tool on Steam, which compiles games associated with Sweet Baby Inc., is gaining popularity among fans who are unhappy with the company's influence on games. The video mentions that the tool's popularity is increasing, and it has become a point of contention between supporters of Sweet Baby and those who believe their involvement negatively impacts games. Sweet Baby's employees are actively trying to get the tool removed, which could result in the user losing their entire game library on Steam.

10:02

💥 Backlash Against Sweet Baby Inc.

The video script delves into the negative impact that Sweet Baby Inc. has allegedly had on various games, including the Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League and Spider-Man series. It criticizes the company for prioritizing certain characters over others based on their inclusivity and diversity agenda, which the video argues has led to a decline in the quality of these games. The backlash against Sweet Baby is growing, with users on Twitter and other platforms expressing their dissatisfaction and support for the curator tool.

15:04

🛡️ Defending the Steam Curator Post

The video addresses the defense mechanisms of Sweet Baby Inc. and their attempts to justify their actions. It points out that the company's narrative team and employees, such as Chris Kindred and Lego Butts, are trying to downplay the curator tool's impact and paint Sweet Baby as a righteous cause. However, the video argues that these efforts are futile as the company's involvement in games has led to their failure and closure of studios, such as those behind Saints Row and Forspoken.

20:06

🌪️ The Future of Sweet Baby Inc.

The video speculates on the future of Sweet Baby Inc. in the gaming industry, suggesting that their reputation may lead to their eventual downfall. It discusses the possibility of the company working uncredited or under different names to avoid the negative associations with their projects. The video concludes by emphasizing the importance of inclusivity in gaming but criticizes the way Sweet Baby Inc. has used it to the detriment of the industry. It calls for a change in the industry's approach to diversity and representation.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡culture war

A term referring to the ongoing conflict of cultural values and norms, often seen in debates over social issues. In the video, it's used to describe the battle between gamers who want to preserve traditional gaming elements and those pushing for more inclusivity and diversity in games.

💡Steam curator

A feature on the Steam platform that allows users to create and share lists of games based on specific criteria. In the context of the video, a curator tool was created to list games worked on by Sweet Baby Inc, which became controversial.

💡Sweet Baby Inc

A consulting firm that specializes in bringing inclusivity and diversity to video games. They advise on character interactions and dialogue to avoid cultural insensitivity. The video criticizes their work as detrimental to the quality of games.

💡inclusivity

The practice of including people who might have been systematically excluded from a particular activity, in this case, video games. The video argues that while inclusivity is not inherently bad, it is being misused to undermine certain characters or narratives.

💡diversity

The range of different things, in this context, referring to the variety of characters and cultures represented in video games. The video suggests that diversity is being pushed in a way that negatively affects the gaming experience.

💡consumer backlash

A strong negative reaction from consumers to a product or service. In the video, this refers to the gaming community's response to games they perceive as being negatively influenced by Sweet Baby Inc.

💡game industry

The sector of the economy concerned with the development, marketing, and sale of video games. The video discusses the impact of cultural debates on this industry.

💡cultural insensitivity

The failure to understand or respect the cultural differences of others, which can lead to offense or misunderstanding. The video suggests that Sweet Baby Inc aims to prevent this in video games.

💡gamerGate

A controversy involving issues of sexism and progressivism in video gaming culture, which led to significant online harassment. The video connects certain individuals from Sweet Baby Inc to this past event.

💡identity politics

Political positions or practices that are based on the interests and perspectives of social groups with which people identify, such as race, gender, or class. The video criticizes the push for identity politics in video games.

💡censorship

The suppression or prohibition of any parts of books, films, news, etc. that are considered obscene, politically unacceptable, or a threat to security. The video discusses attempts to silence dissenting voices within the gaming community.

Highlights

A massive culture war is happening across gaming platforms.

Consumers are fighting back against those who want to change their favorite hobby.

A Steam curator tool lists games worked on by Sweet Baby Inc, a consulting firm promoting inclusivity and diversity in games.

Sweet Baby Inc's involvement has allegedly worsened games, with a notable example being 'Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League'.

The curator tool is gaining popularity, with a rapid increase in followers.

Sweet Baby Inc is trying to get the curator tool removed and the user banned from Steam.

Chris Kindred, a consultant at Sweet Baby Inc, is encouraging followers to report the curator tool.

Lego Bots, another Sweet Baby Inc consultant, has a history of suppressing free speech and enforcing ideological ideas.

Lego Bots was involved in Gamergate and has a history of doxing and bullying.

The video discusses the potential for Sweet Baby Inc to operate uncredited in the future due to public backlash.

The video suggests that games with Sweet Baby Inc's involvement may be rejected by consumers, affecting the industry.

The video argues that inclusivity in games should not come at the cost of belittling or ruining other groups.

The video calls for unity among consumers against what it perceives as fanatics in the industry.

The video concludes that consumers will ultimately win in this culture war, potentially leading to a reset of the industry.

The video emphasizes the importance of not attacking the audience and not stooping to the level of the bullies.

The video ends with a call to action for viewers to subscribe, like, and share the content.

Transcripts

00:00

what's up everyone it's IND demion and

00:01

there's a massive culture War battle

00:03

currently raging across various

00:05

platforms and it's becoming clear as day

00:08

that the consumers that actually keep

00:10

the game industry up float are fighting

00:12

back and the people who want to ruin our

00:14

favorite hobby are not pleased at all

00:16

and they're demanding that these

00:17

individuals be silenced there's quite a

00:20

bit to go over so let's get to it this

00:23

all started because a user on Steam

00:25

decided to release a curator which if

00:27

you don't know what those are they're

00:28

essentially filter tools that you can

00:30

use to find things more effectively on

00:32

Steam like you could have a curator that

00:34

automatically Combs through steam's

00:36

thousands of games and looks for Souls

00:38

likes or jrpgs you get the idea it's a

00:41

handy tool and it makes life for many

00:43

much easier it can also be used to

00:45

compile list of games that have other

00:47

things in common besides genre and this

00:49

curator tool in question compiles all

00:51

the games that sweet baby Inc has worked

00:53

on into one handy comprehensive list

00:56

this has of course pissed off a few

00:58

people who work it sweet baby but let's

01:01

dial back a second here since not

01:03

everyone knows who or what sweet baby

01:05

even is to quickly give you the lore

01:07

surrounding them sweet baby is a

01:09

consulting firm that works primarily on

01:11

video games and their sole mission is to

01:13

bring inclusivity and diversity into the

01:16

games that they work on by handling

01:18

things from character interactions

01:20

dialogue how concepts are presented and

01:22

so on basically when a company doesn't

01:24

know how to properly convey a culture or

01:27

the Small Things included with a

01:28

character so they don't end up making

01:30

something racist by accident they call

01:33

these consulting firms to ensure they

01:35

don't do things in a toned deaf way

01:37

obviously from hearing that you might

01:39

well think that doesn't sound too bad

01:41

right well that's of course the opposite

01:43

of what's Happening Here seeing as how

01:46

pretty much every game that sweet baby

01:47

has touched has been to varying degrees

01:50

made worse with their involvement the

01:52

latest case would of course be Suicide

01:54

Squad kill the Justice League which if

01:56

you compare that game to the previous

01:58

ones is attached to that being of course

02:00

the Batman Arkham games the tonal

02:03

differences not to mention how

02:04

characters are treated couldn't be any

02:07

more different and whenever sweet baby

02:09

gets involved it becomes evidently clear

02:12

that these products suddenly without

02:14

question give favorable care to any

02:16

character that isn't a straight white

02:18

male Batman and Arkham compared to Squad

02:21

is of course one really good example

02:24

however the other one that disappointed

02:25

me greatly was how Peter Parker was

02:27

treated from Spider-Man 2018 compared to

02:30

the most recent game in the 2018 game

02:33

which had no sweet baby involvement to

02:35

my knowledge anyway Peter Parker was an

02:37

extremely capable heroic young man and I

02:40

would argue that version of Peter and

02:42

Spider-Man to be an incredible depiction

02:44

of what a modern-day Spiderman should be

02:47

so much so that I honestly wish the MCU

02:50

Spider-Man was more like that Spidey in

02:52

the 2018 Insomniac game then when you

02:55

play Spider-Man 2 suddenly Peter seems

02:58

weaker and not as capable as a hero

03:00

seemingly out of nowhere and Miles

03:02

Morales who is clearly a person of color

03:05

starts to quickly overshadow Peter and

03:08

by the end of Spider-Man 2 miles is

03:10

confirmed by Insomniac to be the main

03:12

Spider-Man going forward which if you've

03:15

played the Insomniac Games miles being

03:17

the main character doesn't make really

03:19

any sense at all especially considering

03:22

that the main villains of the next

03:24

inevitable Spider-Man game will

03:26

obviously be Green Goblin and Dr Octopus

03:29

and F who played these games would know

03:31

that Miles has no personal connection to

03:34

either of these villains yet of course

03:36

Peter obviously does but that doesn't

03:38

matter because Peter Parker represents

03:41

everything sweet baby and their

03:42

Consultants actively work to undermine

03:44

or ruin in their entirety so this

03:47

company has essentially made video games

03:49

across the board more inclusive but

03:51

retroactively has also made every single

03:53

title they've touched worse because of

03:55

their involvement and this steam curator

03:57

tool compiles a list of every game that

04:00

has had sweet baby involved here I'll

04:02

show you some of the games as you can

04:03

see they've worked on quite a few AAA

04:06

titles already including the son

04:08

Spider-Man games Ratchet and Clank which

04:10

of course introduced rivet who outshines

04:12

ratchet quite often in that game because

04:14

she's a girl so that's a part of their

04:15

objective too and interestingly enough

04:18

you'll also notice quite a few games

04:20

that have either not resonated with fans

04:22

such as Starfield or games that have

04:24

outright bombed and closed Studios like

04:26

for spoken in Saints Row even other DC

04:29

games that got terrible receptions like

04:30

Gotham Knights have also been worked on

04:33

by sweet baby as well which is a game

04:35

that felt like a pale imitation of the

04:37

Batman Arkham series and went out of its

04:39

way to make sure that you knew that

04:41

Nightwing and Robin are not straight

04:43

because ESG reasons as you can see this

04:47

tool is also gaining a lot of steam no

04:49

pun intended in terms of followers last

04:52

night it was around 9,000 follows now as

04:54

the making of this video it's around

04:56

24,000 and as you can see in real time

04:59

here as I refresh the page over and over

05:01

again the number of follows is steadily

05:04

increasing at a healthy rate so this

05:06

curator tool is becoming quickly popular

05:08

and it's clear fans are happy that it

05:10

exists of course the people at Sweet

05:12

Baby think its existence is harmful and

05:15

actively want it removed and are

05:17

resorting to trying to strong arm steam

05:19

into Banning the user in question and if

05:22

that were to happen Not only would this

05:23

user lose their curator tool but access

05:26

to their entire library of games on

05:28

Steam as well so what are these sweet

05:31

baby boys and girls saying exactly well

05:34

before I do that just a reminder don't

05:36

harass these people let's just analyze

05:38

and look over what they're doing and to

05:40

be frank with you guys these sweet baby

05:42

employees are doing more damage

05:44

themselves by bringing attention to this

05:46

to begin with but anyway one of these

05:48

Consultants is someone named Chris

05:50

Kindred who here as you can see tells

05:52

their thousands of followers to report

05:54

this tool and they also made it apparent

05:57

here that they're hoping it works so

05:58

that this user user loses their game

06:00

Library access Kindred is basically

06:04

jangling keys in front of their

06:05

followers to mass harass and report

06:07

someone that they don't agree with which

06:10

is technically against the terms of

06:11

service on Twitter and that's why I tell

06:14

you to not harass these people because

06:16

we cannot stoop to their level there's

06:18

also another sweet Bing Bong baby here

06:21

whose username is Lego butts that name

06:23

might not be familiar to many of you but

06:25

let me catch you up on some lore shall I

06:28

so thanks to grum over on Twitter he's

06:30

the guy who led the original team that

06:32

made World of Warcraft produced Diablo

06:34

II in Starcraft and more well he's on

06:36

our side fellas he thinks sweet baby's a

06:38

cancer as well so he's been calling out

06:40

all of these people who have all to

06:42

varying degrees locked their replies or

06:45

accounts entirely but don't worry I got

06:47

all the receipts already fellas we're

06:49

good over here anyway back to Lego butts

06:52

they work for sweet baby as well and

06:54

they're of course echoing what that

06:56

Kindred person said and wants the

06:57

curator to gone and the user banned on

07:00

Steam for simply making a curator tool

07:03

that does what it's said to do however

07:05

it turns out Lego butts is a veteran of

07:08

the gamergate era as thanks to Grumps so

07:12

back in February 2014 people like Lego

07:14

bots who's embed with people like Zoe

07:16

Quinn who if you know anything about

07:18

gamergate Zoe Quinn is an Infamous

07:20

figure during this time she's a raging

07:23

feminist who actually through

07:25

accusations that weren't true ended up

07:27

getting a game developer to how do I see

07:29

this on YouTube well they un alive

07:31

themselves because of her and she has

07:33

been known to use her influence to get

07:35

positive reviews on stuff she's worked

07:37

on too so back in 2014 Zoe Quinn along

07:40

with this Lego buts user launched a Dos

07:43

attack against a site they didn't agree

07:45

with called the find young capitalists

07:47

which was a targeted attack that brought

07:49

the site down to its knees because

07:51

people like Quinn and Lego didn't agree

07:53

with them and Zoe Quinn was even quoted

07:55

saying when this happened at Lego butts

07:57

oops we dos something on accident then

08:00

Quinn said I like how a conversation

08:02

between me and Lego butts resulted in

08:04

accidentally killing an exploitative

08:06

startups website so who are these young

08:09

capitalists exactly apparently they were

08:11

a charity that was working to get women

08:13

to work in video games and through

08:16

sponsors and charity they would create

08:17

games with the goal of promoting women

08:19

for whatever reason Zoe Quinn Lego butts

08:22

didn't want this to go through and

08:24

though those tweets are still available

08:25

on Twitter as of the making of this

08:27

video anyway they decided to dock a

08:29

charity which resulted in that charity

08:31

losing $10,000 in sponsors due to those

08:34

companies pulling out due to the docks

08:36

and Lego buts went out of their way to

08:38

dox people who worked with this charity

08:40

because they wanted to I'll link a

08:42

Reddit thread in the description if you

08:44

want to go over yourself since it's a

08:47

lot and obviously since I don't want

08:48

this video to be like an hour long I

08:50

won't delve too deep into it but the

08:53

point here is that people like Lego

08:54

butts are intrinsically tied to the

08:56

gamergate era and they now work as a

08:58

consultant with sweet baby ink so this

09:01

is someone who's been heavily involved

09:03

with suppressing free speech and

09:04

enforcing ideological ideas for a long

09:07

time over 10 years at least at this

09:08

point anyway so here's what Lego butts

09:11

had to say concerning this curator tool

09:12

that exposes them again all from Twitter

09:15

so let's read together which listen I'm

09:17

not sure who uses curator list my guess

09:19

is it's people who would never ever buy

09:21

the games any of us work on except they

09:23

do and don't list those particular games

09:25

here but there's just nothing preventing

09:27

this even though it's clearly not

09:29

curators are for it's doubled in

09:31

followers overnight and we get to see

09:33

exactly what people are describing it as

09:35

a way to avoid inclusivity they're just

09:37

saying it and there's no one challenging

09:39

them that isn't a complaint it's just a

09:41

fact and I can't stay quiet about it nor

09:43

should I have to for example at steam

09:46

doesn't have guidelines for curators as

09:48

far as I can tell that would prevent

09:49

someone from starting a curation group

09:51

that focuses on say sweet baby Inc and

09:54

warns people to not buy games they're

09:55

associated with which could just list

09:58

any game at all anyway remember that

10:00

these people do exist and while ignoring

10:01

it goes a very long way boosting those

10:03

you know are affected and targeted is

10:05

the other side of it that needs to also

10:07

happen not even sweet baby just everyone

10:10

existing that they are angry at for

10:11

existing it's pretty funny to see a note

10:14

on my steam curator post I guess they

10:16

need to defend themselves because

10:17

they're completely wrong about

10:18

everything sweet baby or any narrative

10:20

team does and have no interest in

10:22

finding out Lego butts is clearly

10:24

attempting to save face and try to paint

10:27

sweet baby as this righteous cause but

10:29

we know that's anything but the case in

10:31

reality the truth is that everything

10:33

sweet baby has touched has been ruined

10:35

or downright destroyed and it's obvious

10:37

that when they are involved with

10:39

something things can even get so bad

10:41

that they actually end up closing shop

10:44

like with fores spoken or Saints Row

10:46

which are two games whose Studios Clos

10:47

down to how poorly they sold and

10:49

reviewed of course users on Twitter then

10:52

began replying to these consultants and

10:54

they had some good things to say like

10:55

this person for example I'm confused why

10:58

would this be a problem no matter what

11:00

your thoughts are I don't see why it

11:01

shouldn't be allowed for a curator to

11:03

identify games with some specific

11:04

companies involved I'm sure other cators

11:07

do similar things for different reasons

11:09

cringe I thought you were proud of your

11:11

work why hide it this one especially

11:14

resonated with me cuz it's true if a

11:16

consulting firm like this is so proud of

11:18

their work on the video games that they

11:20

create why wouldn't they want their work

11:22

to be more publicly known the only

11:24

reason why you wouldn't want your work

11:26

to be known is because you know deep

11:28

down in your heart part that what you're

11:29

doing is disingenuous and actively Works

11:33

to ruin the products you're involved

11:35

with there simply can't be any other

11:37

reason and that's what many users are

11:40

clearly pushing back against everyone is

11:42

tired and annoyed of their favorite

11:44

games getting destroyed like this time

11:46

and again all I wanted was great

11:48

Spider-Man games that didn't sideline

11:50

Peter Parker or make him seem pathetic

11:53

yet as soon as we baby got involved with

11:55

Spider-Man it was obvious that anyone

11:57

who is white straight or male must be

11:59

ruined to make way for the new age of

12:02

progress in their minds I guess and

12:04

we're clearly all tired of it and it's

12:06

clear that when consumers voice their

12:08

opinions they just get attacked and

12:10

belittled constantly so the only real

12:12

course of action that will actually

12:14

change things is for consumers to vote

12:16

with their wallets which is clearly what

12:18

they've been doing and remember that

12:20

stuff like Saints Row or for spoken

12:22

failed and imploded long before anyone

12:24

even knew what sweet baby even was at

12:26

the time those games were not boy Ed

12:29

because of these Consultants being

12:30

involved as like I said their name in

12:33

existence was largely unknown at the

12:35

time but it was clear that the messages

12:37

and handling of these games were

12:38

considered so poor that users rejected

12:41

them anyway so to say that players

12:43

rejected games like those in order to

12:45

stick a middle finger to this consulting

12:47

firm when again no one really knew they

12:50

existed during those game's releases is

12:53

just not true at all but now of course

12:55

we've been made more aware and that

12:57

worries them and they lik are angry cuz

13:00

now their name is being attached to

13:01

something that will instantly Mark those

13:03

games for failure and if the hard work

13:05

of the games made are rejected and fail

13:08

because of sweet baby's involvement then

13:10

obviously going forward less Studios or

13:12

Publishers would want to actively work

13:14

with sweet babies so their games aren't

13:16

marked and rejected in a mass exodus by

13:18

Future fans but really that isn't the

13:21

fault of the fans or this curator tool

13:24

either because sweet baby could have

13:26

been a positive change in the games that

13:28

they work on but it's clear that their

13:30

ideology and group Collective mindset is

13:32

anything but what fans want in their

13:34

games so really if these people are mad

13:37

about this they can't blame anyone but

13:40

themselves because I didn't tell these

13:42

Consultants to do what they did nor did

13:44

any of you watching why is it our fault

13:47

that these Consultants have ruined so

13:48

many great franchises already then of

13:50

course the question becomes well what do

13:52

they have to do in the future then of

13:54

course this consulting firm will want to

13:56

keep getting paid and exist but if they

13:58

their name being tied to a project will

14:00

instantly flag it for Mass rejection

14:02

what do they do now the likely scenario

14:05

is they work on future projects in an

14:07

uncredited fashion or they get listed in

14:10

the credits of future projects with

14:12

different names like instead of the

14:13

credits of a game just saying sweet baby

14:15

in it it'll just say consultants and a

14:18

name or something like that but I would

14:20

argue going forward now that people are

14:22

hyper aware to the existence of this

14:24

group and every single game being made

14:26

now especially those of Western Studios

14:28

will have their credits and development

14:30

examined with a surgical lens and every

14:33

single game being made will be examined