Meet the Press full broadcast — March 24

NBC News
24 Mar 202447:40

Summary

TLDRIn this interview, former Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer discusses the impact of the Dobbs decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade, and his views on the current state of the Supreme Court. He emphasizes the importance of understanding the real-world consequences of court rulings and expresses disappointment over the leak of the draft opinion. Justice Breyer also shares his thoughts on the retirement process and the ideological balance of the Court, highlighting the need for a non-partisan approach to judicial appointments.

Takeaways

  • 💰 President Biden has a cash advantage over Donald Trump in the 2024 campaign, highlighting the financial disparity between the two potential candidates.
  • 🏦 Trump's legal bills are mounting, and he is seeking campaign donors to help pay them, indicating financial strain on his campaign.
  • 🤝 Ronna McDaniel, former RNC chair, discusses the tension and friction within the Republican Party, particularly regarding the handling of debates and the nomination process.
  • 🚨 McDaniel's interview raises questions about the role of the RNC in the 2020 election and the party's future direction.
  • 🎤 The panel discussion highlights the importance of journalistic integrity and the challenges of representing diverse viewpoints in the media.
  • 📖 Retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer speaks on the impact of the Dobbs decision and the importance of considering real-world consequences in constitutional interpretation.
  • 🚨 Breyer's retirement and the changing ideological balance on the Supreme Court are discussed, emphasizing the impact of these changes on future court decisions.
  • 🤔 The conversation with Breyer touches on the potential for compromise in Supreme Court decisions, but also the difficulty in predicting the long-term effects of such decisions.
  • 📉 Trust in the Supreme Court is reported to be near an all-time low, reflecting increased political polarization and public skepticism.
  • 🏛️ The historical context of Supreme Court nominations is provided, contrasting the bipartisan support for Breyer's appointment with the current highly partisan confirmation process.
  • 📚 Breyer's new book, 'Reading the Constitution,' is mentioned as a resource for understanding his perspective on constitutional interpretation and the role of the Court.

Q & A

  • What is the main topic of discussion in the interview with Ronna McDaniel?

    -The main topic of discussion in the interview with Ronna McDaniel is her stepping down as RNC Chair, her views on the 2020 election, the Republican Party's stance on various issues, and her thoughts on the current political climate.

  • What was Ronna McDaniel's response to the claim that she enabled Donald Trump to spread election lies?

    -Ronna McDaniel defended her actions by stating that there were genuine concerns about the 2020 election at the time, but she also acknowledged that Joe Biden is the legitimate President and that the election was certified and done.

  • How did Ronna McDaniel address the issue of her credibility after her statements on the 2020 election?

    -Ronna McDaniel argued that she has always acknowledged Biden as the President and that expressing concerns about the election does not negate his legitimacy. She also emphasized her commitment to the Republican Party and her belief in having different viewpoints in the country's political discourse.

  • What was Justice Stephen Breyer's stance on the overturning of Roe v. Wade?

    -Justice Stephen Breyer dissented on the overturning of Roe v. Wade and expressed disappointment in the decision, highlighting the life-altering consequences of such a ruling and the importance of considering the real-world impacts of constitutional interpretations.

  • What did Justice Breyer suggest about the Supreme Court's decision-making process?

    -Justice Breyer suggested that the Supreme Court's decision-making process should not be solely based on the original text of the Constitution but should also consider the real-world consequences of its rulings, emphasizing the importance of understanding the details relevant to important decisions.

  • How did Justice Breyer respond to the question about the potential for a compromise on the Dobbs case?

    -Justice Breyer did not provide a direct answer to the question about a potential compromise on the Dobbs case. He stated that he usually hopes for compromise but did not want to speculate or make news about the case.

  • What was the context behind the discussion on the Supreme Court's handling of the 2020 election cases?

    -The context behind the discussion on the Supreme Court's handling of the 2020 election cases was the then-upcoming arguments about Donald Trump's claim to be immune from criminal prosecution for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. The discussion revolved around the Court's decision to take up the case and the potential impact on public trust in the Court.

  • What was the panel's reaction to Ronna McDaniel's interview?

    -The panel expressed mixed reactions to Ronna McDaniel's interview. Some panelists questioned her credibility and motives, given her role as a paid contributor to NBC News and her past actions as RNC Chair. Others discussed the importance of ideological diversity in media and the challenges of navigating political interviews.

  • What did the panel discuss regarding the future of the Supreme Court and its legitimacy?

    -The panel discussed the decreasing public trust in the Supreme Court, the hyperpartisan politics affecting its confirmation process, and the historical context of Justice Breyer's own confirmation, which was less partisan than recent ones. They also touched on the potential benefits of term limits for Supreme Court Justices.

  • How did Justice Breyer view the impact of the Dobbs decision?

    -Justice Breyer anticipated that the Dobbs decision would lead to a number of issues coming to the courts, particularly due to the overruling of Roe v. Wade. He expressed his belief that the decision had real-world consequences and was a significant departure from the Court's previous interpretations of the Constitution.

  • What was Justice Breyer's perspective on the retirement of Supreme Court Justices?

    -Justice Breyer acknowledged that deciding to retire from the Supreme Court is a difficult decision. He mentioned considering the right time to retire, the opportunity for others to serve, and the challenges of making tough decisions at an advanced age.

Outlines

00:00

💰 Campaign Finances and Legal Bills

The paragraph discusses the financial aspects of the 2024 campaign, highlighting President Biden's cash advantage over Donald Trump. It mentions Trump's legal bills and his request for campaign donors to help pay them. The conversation shifts to Ronna McDaniel, former RNC chair, discussing the Republican Party's financial strategy and the impact of Trump's legal issues on the campaign.

05:01

🗳️ Election Integrity and RNC's Role

This section delves into the former President Donald Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and the stress this has placed on American institutions. It includes an exclusive interview with former Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, discussing the weight of considering cases central to the presidential election. The conversation also touches on the Supreme Court's decision on Trump's immunity and prosecution for his election subversion efforts.

10:01

🎙️ Ronna McDaniel's Interview and RNC's Strategy

In this segment, Ronna McDaniel shares insights into her decision to step down as RNC chair, the tension during the debates, and her stance on Trump's potential return as the party's nominee. McDaniel discusses the fundraising agreement between the Trump campaign and the RNC, and her views on using donations to pay Trump's legal bills. She also addresses criticisms about her tenure as RNC chair.

15:02

🚨 Trump's January 6th Remarks and McDaniel's Response

The paragraph focuses on the aftermath of the 2020 election, particularly the events of January 6th. McDaniel strongly condemns the violence that occurred, stating it does not represent the Republican Party. She discusses Trump's comments about freeing those convicted of crimes related to January 6th and her disagreement with such a stance. McDaniel emphasizes the importance of not attacking the Capitol and the necessity of denouncing the events of that day.

20:03

📞 The Controversial Phone Call and Election Certification

This section details a controversial phone call involving Ronna McDaniel and Donald Trump, urging Michigan officials not to certify the election results. McDaniel defends her actions by stating her concern was for the safety of the officials after they faced threats and intimidation. She clarifies her position on the election certification process and the need for audits, while also expressing regret for the threats faced by election workers.

25:04

🤝 Bipartisanship and the Future of the RNC

The discussion here revolves around the challenges of bipartisanship and the future direction of the Republican Party. McDaniel talks about the importance of different viewpoints and the need for respectful dialogue. She also addresses criticisms of her credibility and the perception that she enabled Trump's election lies. McDaniel emphasizes her commitment to the country and her desire for open conversations in the political discourse.

30:04

👨‍⚖️ Justice Breyer on Interpreting the Constitution

Justice Stephen Breyer shares his views on interpreting the Constitution, emphasizing the importance of considering the real-world consequences of rulings. He discusses the change in how people interpret legal documents and the potential impact of the Dobbs decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade. Breyer also touches on the role of the Supreme Court in the current political climate and the importance of public trust in the institution.

35:09

📚 Justice Breyer's New Book and Legal Philosophy

Justice Breyer discusses his new book, which advocates for looking beyond the original text of the Constitution to understand the intentions behind it. He explains why he believes this approach is crucial for interpreting the law and making decisions. The conversation also includes Breyer's thoughts on the potential for compromise in legal decisions and his views on the leak of the Dobbs draft opinion.

40:10

🎖️ Justice Breyer's Tenure and Retirement

In this part, Justice Breyer reflects on his tenure on the Supreme Court and the decision to retire. He discusses the difficulty of leaving the Court and the considerations that went into his decision. Breyer also talks about the potential benefits of having term limits for Supreme Court Justices and his belief that such a system would not be harmful.

45:11

🏛️ The Changing Confirmation Process and Public Trust

The panelists discuss the changing landscape of Supreme Court nominations, noting the increasing politicization and the impact on public trust. They reflect on Justice Breyer's confirmation process, which was bipartisan, and contrast it with more recent, highly partisan confirmations. The conversation highlights the need for reform in the confirmation process to preserve the integrity of the judiciary.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Supreme Court

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States and has the ultimate jurisdiction over all federal and state courts. In the video, former Justice Stephen Breyer discusses his time on the Supreme Court and the importance of understanding the details relevant to important decisions made by the Court.

💡Roe v. Wade

Roe v. Wade is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court that established a woman's legal right to have an abortion. The video discusses the overturning of this decision in the Dobbs case, which has significant implications for reproductive rights in the United States.

💡Originalism

Originalism is a legal philosophy that advocates for interpreting the Constitution based on its original meaning or the intent of its framers. In the video, Justice Breyer critiques the approach of originalism, arguing that it is not always practical or sufficient for understanding the Constitution's application to modern issues.

💡Compromise

In the context of the video, a compromise refers to the possibility of finding a middle ground or agreement in legal decisions, particularly in contentious cases like those involving abortion rights. Justice Breyer mentions his hope for compromise, indicating a preference for solutions that balance competing interests and rights.

💡Leak

A leak refers to the unauthorized disclosure of information, typically kept confidential or secret. In the video, the discussion revolves around the leak of the draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade, which had significant repercussions for the Supreme Court's operations and the trust in the institution.

💡Retirement

In the context of the video, retirement refers to Justice Breyer's decision to step down from the Supreme Court, which he describes as a difficult choice influenced by various factors, including age and the desire to allow others the opportunity to serve.

💡Ideological Balance

Ideological balance refers to the even distribution of political or philosophical views within a group or institution, such as the Supreme Court. In the video, Justice Breyer suggests that considerations of ideological balance were partly behind his decision to retire.

💡Confirmation Process

The confirmation process is the series of steps taken to appoint a justice to the Supreme Court, including nomination by the President and review by the Senate. The video highlights the increasing partisanship in this process and contrasts it with the bipartisan support for Justice Breyer's appointment in 1994.

💡Public Trust

Public trust refers to the confidence and faith that the public has in an institution or system. In the video, Justice Breyer expresses concern about the erosion of public trust in the Supreme Court, which he attributes in part to the politicization of the confirmation process and the impact of leaks.

💡Partisan Politics

Partisan politics refers to the practice of promoting the policies and interests of a particular political party, often to the exclusion of the opposition. The video script indicates a concern about the increasing influence of partisan politics on the Supreme Court, particularly in the context of nominations and confirmations.

Highlights

President Biden has a cash advantage in the 2024 campaign, contrasting with Donald Trump's lead in the polls.

Trump's legal bills are mounting, and he is urging campaign donors to help pay them.

Ronna McDaniel, the former RNC chair, discusses the tension and friction during the debate process.

McDaniel implies she was pushed out of her role due to Trump's desire to have his allies take over.

The RNC is now fully formed in Trump's image, with Trump's daughter-in-law and a new fundraiser benefiting his campaign and legal bills.

McDaniel defends the RNC's role in the 2020 election and the subsequent legal battles.

Justice Stephen Breyer speaks out about the decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and his thoughts on potential compromises.

Breyer's retirement from the Supreme Court and his perspectives on the nomination process and the Court's public trust.

The panel discusses the credibility of Ronna McDaniel as a contributor to NBC News and her past actions as RNC chair.

Justice Breyer's views on the importance of understanding the real-world consequences of Supreme Court rulings.

The discussion on whether the public deserves to know the verdict in the election subversion case before November.

Breyer's thoughts on the potential for future overturning of Dobbs and the impact of the leaked draft opinion.

The historical context of Supreme Court nominations and the changing political landscape.

Justice Breyer's suggestions for term limits on Supreme Court Justices to avoid politicization.

The challenges of deciding to retire from the Supreme Court and the considerations involved.

Justice Breyer's reflections on his time at the Supreme Court and the difficulty of stepping down.

The panel's insights into the future of the Supreme Court and the implications of Justice Breyer's retirement.

The importance of public trust in the Supreme Court and the impact of recent events on this trust.

Transcripts

00:09

>>> THIS SUNDAY, PARTY TAKEOVER.

00:12

>>> THIS SUNDAY, PARTY TAKEOVER.

00:13

DONALD TRUMP MAY BE LEADING IN

00:14

THE POLLS, BUT IT'S PRESIDENT

00:16

BIDEN WHO HAS THE CASH ADVANTAGE

00:18

IN THE 2024 CAMPAIGN.

00:19

>> WE HAVE TO RAISE A LOT OF

00:21

MONEY.

00:22

>> AS HIS LEGAL BILLS MOUNT,

00:25

TRUMP WANTS CAMPAIGN DONORS TO

00:27

HELP PAY THEM.

00:28

>> WE HAVE A LOT OF CASH AND WE

00:29

HAVE A GREAT COMPANY, BUT THEY

00:31

WANT TO TAKE IT AWAY.

00:32

THEY'D LIKE TO TAKE THE CASH

00:34

AWAY SO I CAN'T USE IT ON THE

00:35

CAMPAIGN.

00:36

>> IS THAT A WINNING STRATEGY?

00:38

I'LL SPEAK WITH RONNA McDANIEL.

00:40

THE FORMER CHAIRWOMAN OF THE

00:42

REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE.

00:43

PLUS, SUPREME DECISIONS.

00:45

FORMER SUPREME COURT JUSTICE

00:46

STEPHEN BREYER SPEAKS OUT ABOUT

00:48

THE DECISION TO OVERTURN ROE V.

00:50

WADE.

00:50

>> DID YOU THINK THAT A

00:53

COMPROMISE WAS POSSIBLE BEFORE

00:55

THE WEEK AROUND 15 WEEKS?

00:57

>> I USUALLY HOPE FOR

00:58

COMPROMISE.

00:59

>> AND HIS DECISION TO STEP DOWN

01:01

FROM THE COURT.

01:03

>> IF IT WASN'T FOR YOU TO

01:05

DECIDE TO RETIRE.

01:06

>> JOINING ME FOR INSIGHT AND

01:08

ANALYSIS ARE, NBC NEWS CHIEF

01:10

POLITICAL ANALYST CHUCK TODD.

01:12

KIMBERLY ATKINS STOHR, SENIOR

01:14

OPINION WRITER FOR THE BOSTON

01:18

GLOBE AND STEPHEN HAYES, EDITOR

01:20

OF THE DISPATCH.

01:21

WELL

01:22

WELCOME TO SUNDAY.

01:24

IT'S MEET THE PRESS".

01:25

>> FROM NBC NEWS IN WASHINGTON,

01:27

THE LONGEST RUNNING SHOW IN

01:28

TELEVISION HISTORY, THIS IS

01:30

"MEET THE PRESS" WITH KRISTEN

01:32

WELKER.

01:33

>>> GOOD SUNDAY MORNING.

01:35

FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP'S

01:36

EFFORT TO OVERTURN THE 2020

01:38

ELECTION IS PUTTING AN

01:40

UNPRECEDENTED STRESS TEST ON

01:42

AMERICAN INSTITUTIONS AHEAD OF

01:44

THE 2024 ELECTION.

01:46

WITH A SUPREME COURT ALREADY

01:47

DECIDING TRUMP CAN REMAIN ON THE

01:50

BALLOT IN COLORADO, NOW WEIGHING

01:51

WHETHER HE HAS TOTAL IMMUNITY

01:53

AND PROSECUTION FOR HIS ELECTION

01:55

SUBVERSION EFFORTS, THIS WEEK I

01:57

SPOKE EXCLUSIVELY WITH FORMER

01:58

SUPREME COURT JUSTICE STEPHEN

02:01

BREYER WHERE I ASKED HIM ABOUT

02:05

THE WEIGHT A JUSTICE FIELDS WHEN

02:07

CONSIDERING THESE CASES THAT

02:08

HAVE BECOME CENTRAL TO THE

02:09

PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.

02:10

>> CAN YOU DESCRIBE THE WEIGHT

02:12

THAT YOU FELT, THAT ONE FEELS AS

02:16

A JUSTICE WHEN YOU ARE PRESENTED

02:19

WITH A CASE OF A PRESIDENTIAL

02:20

ELECTION.

02:21

>> THIS IS NOT JUST AN ELECTION.

02:25

IMAGINE YOU WERE ON THE COURT

02:27

THAT DECIDED BROWN VERSUS BOARD

02:28

OF EDUCATION.

02:29

IMAGINE THAT YOU WERE ON THE

02:33

COURT THAT HAD TO DECIDE, WELL,

02:35

FOR EXAMPLE, WHETHER PRESIDENT

02:38

NIXON WAS IMMUNE FROM GIVING --

02:41

DIDN'T HAVE TO TURN THE TAPES

02:44

OVER TO R.G. COX.

02:45

IMAGINE THAT.

02:46

>> MORE OF MY INTERVIEW WITH

02:48

JUSTICE BREYER IS COMING UP, BUT

02:50

FIRST, I'LL BE JOINED BY FORMER

02:53

RNC CHAIR RONNA McDANIEL IN HER

02:55

FIRST INTERVIEW SINCE STEPPING

02:56

DOWN AS PARTY CHAIR.

02:57

IN FULL DISCLOSURE TO OUR

02:59

VIEWERS, THIS INTERVIEW WAS

03:00

SCHEDULED WEEKS BEFORE IT WAS

03:02

ANNOUNCED THAT McDANIEL HAD

03:04

BECOME A PAID NBC NEWS

03:05

CONTRIBUTOR.

03:06

THIS WILL BE A NEWS INTERVIEW,

03:08

AND I WAS NOT INVOLVED IN HER

03:09

HIRING.

03:11

THIS WEEK WE EARN WELLEDLEARNED

03:14

TRUMP'S GRIP ON THE REPUBLICAN

03:17

PARTY IS IMPACTING THE GOP'S

03:18

BOTTOM LINE.

03:19

IT HAS MORE THAN DOUBLE THE CASH

03:22

OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN, WHILE THE

03:25

PRESIDENT HAS SHARPENED HIS

03:27

ATTACKS WITH HIS PREDECESSOR

03:29

OVER HIS MOUNTING LEGAL DEBTS.

03:31

TRUMP HAS A NEW FUNDRAISER WITH

03:33

THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL

03:35

COMMITTEE THAT WILL FILTER

03:37

DONATIONS TO BOTH HIS CAMPAIGN

03:39

AND THE SUPER PAC PAYING HIS

03:42

CAMPAIGN BEFORE THE RNC GETTING

03:43

A CUT.

03:45

WITH MICHAEL WATLEY AND HIS

03:47

DAUGHTER-IN-LAW, LAURA TRUMP,

03:48

THE PARTY IS NOW FULLY FORMED IN

03:50

TRUMP'S IMAGE.

03:51

>> WE ARE GOING TO DETERMINE THE

03:53

FATE OF NOT ONLY THE UNITED

03:55

STATES, BUT OF THE ENTIRE WORLD

03:58

AND THIS BODY, THE RNC, IS GOING

04:01

TO BE THE VANGUARD OF A MOVEMENT

04:06

THAT WILL WORK TIRELESSLY EVERY

04:09

SINGLE DAY TO ELECT OUR NOMINEE

04:11

DONALD J. TRUMP.

04:11

>> WE ARE GOING TO MAKE SURE

04:14

THAT EVERY SINGLE PENNY OF EVERY

04:16

DOLLAR RAISED GOES TOWARDS ONE

04:18

GOAL WHICH IS WINNING.

04:19

>> JOINING ME NOW IS FORMER RNC

04:22

CHAIR RONNA McDANIEL.

04:25

WELCOME BACK TO "MEET THE PRESS"

04:27

THANKS FOR BEING HERE.

04:29

>> THANKS FOR HAVING ME.

04:30

>> LET'S START WITH YOUR

04:32

DECISION TO STEP DOWN AS RNC

04:32

CHAIR.

04:33

IF YOU CAN TAKE ME BEHIND THE

04:36

SCENES A LITTLE BIT.

04:38

WERE YOU PUSHED OUT OF YOUR

04:39

ROLE?

04:41

>> THERE'S NO QUESTION THAT AS

04:43

RNC CHAIR WE HAVE TO REMAIN

04:46

NEUTRAL ANDEE WE HAD DEBATES AND

04:47

THERE WAS TENSION AND FRICTION

04:49

THAT STARTED DURING THAT

04:49

PROCESS.

04:50

IT WAS WELL PLAYED OUT IN THE

04:52

MEDIA, AND I KNEW AT THAT POINT

04:53

WHEN I WAS DOING THAT ROLE AND

04:55

WE WERE GOING TO HAVE DEBATES

04:57

THAT WHEN THE NOMINEE CAME

04:58

FORWARD AND IT WAS LIKELY TO BE

05:00

PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT THEY WOULD

05:01

WANT TO SWITCH, AND THAT'S HIS

05:03

RIGHT AS A NOMINEE.

05:05

>> SO WERE YOU PUSHED OUT BY

05:07

HIM?

05:07

>> HE ABSOLUTELY WANTED ME TO

05:11

MOVE ASIDE AND WANTED MICHAEL

05:13

WHATLEY AND LARA TRUMP TO COME

05:15

IN.

05:16

>> YOU PUT OUT THAT STATEMENT

05:19

EFFECTIVELY CALLING ON NIKKI

05:21

HALEY TO STEP OUT OF THE RACE?

05:23

CAN YOU SAY YOU WERE NEUTRAL?

05:24

>> I CAN'T.

05:25

WE HAD A NEUTRAL PRIMARY AND WE

05:28

HAD DEBATES AND THE DEMOCRATS

05:30

DIDN'T HAVE DEBATES AND NOW THEY

05:33

HAVE RFK JR. AS A THIRD PARTY, I

05:36

THINK THAT'S SO IMPORTANT TO OUR

05:38

PUBLIC DISCOURSE SO YES, I WAS

05:40

NEUTRAL, BUT AS I SAID AT THAT

05:41

TIME THERE WAS NO MATH AND NO

05:43

PATH AND THAT WAS TRUE, AND SO

05:44

WE DID NEED TO CONSOLIDATE

05:46

BEHIND THE NOMINEE AND THAT'S

05:47

WHAT I DID.

05:48

>> YOU TALK ABOUT THE TEPGDZS

05:50

AROUND THE DEBATES.

05:52

WAS THERE A BREAKING POINT WITH

05:53

FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP

05:54

AND YOU?

05:56

>> IT WAS A LOT OF TENSION WITH

05:58

THE CAMPAIGN.

05:59

HE REALLY DID NOT FEEL LIKE WE

06:00

SHOULD HAVE DEBATES.

06:01

HE SAID THIS PUBLICLY.

06:03

I GOT A LOT OF PHONE CALLS.

06:05

>> FROM HIM?

06:07

PHONE CALLS FROM TRUMP DIRECTLY.

06:09

>> FROM HIS CAMPAIGN AND I

06:10

TALKED TO HIM DIRECTLY.

06:12

>> YOU SAW SUPPORTERS.

06:13

DON'T GIVE TO THE RNC.

06:15

DON'T HAVE DEBATES.

06:16

LISTEN, THERE ARE A LOT OF

06:17

PEOPLE WHO SUPPORT PRESIDENT

06:19

TRUMP IN OUR PARTY, BUT THERE

06:20

ARE OTHERS WHO DIDN'T AND THEY

06:22

NEEDED TO SEE THAT PROCESS TO

06:23

PLAY OUT TO SAY THIS WAS FAIR,

06:26

MY CANDIDATE WAS GIVEN AN

06:27

OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TO THE

06:28

AMERICAN PEOPLE.

06:29

THE VOTERS DECIDED, AND THIS IS

06:31

THE NOMINEE, AND BECAUSE WE LET

06:33

THAT PROCESS PLAY OUT HE HAS --

06:35

HE'S THE NOMINEE WITHOUT A THIRD

06:37

PARTY RUNNING AGAINST HIM WHICH

06:38

IS THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT THE

06:39

DEMOCRATS DID.

06:40

>> YOU WERE REPLACED BY DONALD

06:43

TRUMP'S HAND PICKED ALLIES

06:45

INCLUDING HIS DAUGHTER-IN-LAW

06:46

LARA TRUMP AND NOW THERE IS A

06:48

FUND-RAISING AGREEMENT WHICH

06:50

BASICALLY MEANS THE DONATIONS GO

06:51

TO THE SUPER PAC TO PAY FOR HIS

06:54

LEGAL BILLS BEFORE THEY GO TO

06:55

THE RNC.

06:56

IS IT APPROPRIATE FOR DONALD

06:58

TRUMP TO ASK DONORS TO PAY FOR

07:00

HIS LEGAL BILLS.

07:01

>> AS LONG AS THE DONORS KNOW

07:03

THAT THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE DOING.

07:05

IT IS IN THE WATERFALL OF IT.

07:07

IT IS SAVE AMERICA BEFORE THE

07:07

RNC.

07:08

WHAT I ALSO THINK THAT MEANS IS

07:11

THAT THE CAMPAIGNS OR THE RNC IS

07:12

BEING TRUTHFUL WHEN THEY SAY

07:13

THEY'RE NOT GOING TO PAY THE

07:15

LEGAL BILLS AND IT IS GOING TO

07:17

RUN THROUGH THE SAVE AMERICA

07:17

PACT.

07:18

>> ULTIMATELY, THESE DONATIONS

07:20

ARE GOING FIRST TO PAY HIS LEGAL

07:21

BILLS.

07:22

PEOPLE WHO MAY BE STRUGGLING IN

07:24

SOME CASES TO MAKE ENDS MEET, IS

07:26

THERE NOT AN ETHICAL CHALLENGE

07:27

WITH THAT?

07:28

>> IF THEY FEEL TRONGLY TO

07:31

SUPPORT HIS LEGAL BILLS THEN

07:32

THEY HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO DO SO,

07:34

AND I THINK HE'S BEING VERY OPEN

07:36

THAT THEY'RE HELPING WITH HIS

07:38

LEGAL BILLS.

07:39

>> YOU PAID $2 MILLION FOR HIS

07:42

LEGAL BILLS WHILE HE WAS STILL

07:43

IN OFFICE.

07:44

DO YOU HAVE REGRETS OF THAT?

07:46

DO YOU THINK IT WAS APPROPRIATE?

07:47

>> AS A FORMER PRESIDENT AND

07:48

SOMEONE WHO RAISED A LOT OF

07:51

MONEY INTO THE RNC, WE PAID LESS THAN $2 MILLION IN LEGAL BILLS

07:53

THAN $2 MILLION IN LEGAL BILLS

07:55

AND WE DIDN'T ONCE HE BECAME A

08:00

NOMINEE OR CANDIDATE WE CUT THAT

08:01

OFF.

08:02

IT'S DIFFERENT WHEN YOU'RE A

08:03

FORMER PRESIDENT THAN WHEN

08:04

YOU'RE A CANDIDATE.

08:05

>> ONE TOLD POLITICO YOU WERE A,

08:08

QUOTE, FAILED CHAIR.

08:09

ANOTHER SAID WE LOST THE SENATE

08:11

AND THE WHITE HOUSE WHIL SHE WAS

08:12

CHAIR.

08:12

DID YOU DESERVE TO STAY ON WITH

08:14

THAT TRACK RECORD, RONNA?

08:16

>> YOU KNOW, I PUSH BACK ON THAT

08:17

VERY HARD.

08:18

THE FACT THAT UNDER MY TIME AS

08:20

CHAIR WE'VE HAD MORE WOMEN IN

08:22

CONGRESS EVER THAN IN THE

08:23

HISTORY OF OUR PARTY, THAT WE'VE

08:25

HAD MORE MINORITY GROWTH IN OUR

08:26

PARTY AND THAT DIDN'T JUST

08:27

HAPPEN.

08:28

I HAD OFFICES OPEN IN BLACK,

08:30

ASIAN, HISPANIC COMMUNITIES THAT

08:32

WE HAD IGNORED AS A PARTY AND WE

08:34

HAVE SEEN GROWTH AS A RESULT,

08:35

WHICH BY THE WAY, WE'RE SEEING

08:37

IN THIS ELECTION, AS WELL AND

08:38

THEN I'M GOING TO POINT OUT TO

08:39

THIS.

08:40

THE RNC, WE DON'T DO THE

08:43

MESSAGING AND WE DON'T PICK THE

08:44

CANDIDATES.

08:44

WE'RE A TURNOUT.

08:46

IF YOU LOOK AT 2022, JUST 2022,

08:49

WE TURNED OUT 4 MILLION MORE

08:51

REPUBLICANS AND WE WOULD HAVE

08:53

WON THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE BASED

08:54

ON THE TURNOUT.

08:56

WHAT I SAY TO PEOPLE IF WE'RE

08:57

BUILDING THE ROAD THAT ALL OF

09:01

THE CANDIDATES DRIVE ON, AND ONE

09:03

CANDIDATE GOT TO THE FINISH LINE

09:04

THE ROAD ISN'T THE PROBLEM.

09:06

IT'S CANDIDATE TO CANDIDATE.

09:08

I VIEW MY RNC TENURE AS A

09:10

SUCCESS.

09:11

>> LET'S TALK ABOUT THE ELECTION

09:11

NOW.

09:12

DONALD TRUMP SAYS ONE OF HIS

09:14

FIRST ACTS IF HE IS RE-ELECTED

09:16

TO A SECOND TERM WOULD BE,

09:18

QUOTE, TO FREE THOSE CHARGED AND

09:20

CONVICTED OF CRIMES RELATED TO

09:22

JANUARY 6th.

09:23

DO YOU SUPPORT THAT?

09:24

>> I WANT TO BE VERY CLEAR.

09:26

THE VIOLENCE THAT HAPPENED ON

09:28

JANUARY 6th IS UNACCEPTABLE.

09:30

IT DOESN'T REPRESENT OUR

09:32

COUNTRY.

09:32

IT CERTAINLY DOES NOT REPRESENT

09:33

MY PARTY.

09:34

WE SHOULD NOT BE ATTACKING THE

09:36

CAPITOL.

09:36

WE SHOULD NOT BE HAVING

09:37

VIOLENCE.

09:38

I SAID IT THAT DAY.

09:40

I PUT A STATEMENT OUT THAT DAY

09:42

THAT THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.

09:45

IF YOU ATTACKED OUR CAPITOL AND

09:47

YOU HAVE BEEN CONVICTED THEN

09:48

THAT SHOULD STAY.

09:49

>> SO THEN TO THE QUESTION,

09:52

THOUGH, DO YOU DISAGREE WITH

09:54

TRUMP SAYING THAT HE'LL FREE

09:56

THOSE --

09:57

>> I DO NOT THINK THAT PEOPLE

09:58

WHO COMMITTED VIOLENT ACTS ON

10:00

JANUARY 6th SHOULD BE FREE.

10:01

>> SO YOU DISAGREE.

10:02

HE'S BEEN SAYING THAT FOR

10:03

MONTHS?

10:04

WHY NOT SPEAK OUT EARLIER?

10:06

WHY NOT SPEAK OUT ABOUT THAT

10:07

NOW?

10:07

>> WHEN YOU'RE THE RNC CHAIR YOU

10:10

TAKE ONE FOR THE WHOLE TEAM,

10:11

RIGHT?

10:11

NOW I CAN GET TO BE MORE MYSELF,

10:13

RIGHT?

10:14

THIS IS WHAT I BELIEVE.

10:15

I DON'T THINK VIOLENCE SHOULD BE

10:17

IN OUR POLITICAL DISCOURSE,

10:19

REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT, AND I

10:20

DISAGREE WITH THAT.

10:21

I AGREE WITH HIM ON A WHOLE HOST

10:23

OF OTHER THINGS.

10:24

LET'S CLOSE THE BORDER.

10:25

LET'S MAKE SURE WE HAVE GOOD

10:27

INCOMES FOR PEOPLE.

10:28

LET'S MAKE SURE WE DO A LOT OF

10:30

GREAT THING, BUT ON THAT POINT I

10:32

DON'T THINK WE SHOULD BE FREEING

10:33

PEOPLE WHO VIOLENTLY ATTACKED

10:35

CAPITOL HILL POLICE OFFICERS AND

10:36

ATTACKED THE CAPITOL.

10:38

>> RONNA, THAT IS SUCH A

10:39

FUNDAMENTAL POINT.

10:41

SUCH A FUNDAMENTAL POINT TO OUR

10:43

DEMOCRACY.

10:44

YOU SAY YOU STILL SUPPORT HIM

10:45

AND YOU WILL VOTE FOR HIM BASED

10:47

ON THAT.

10:48

WHAT DO YOU SAY TO THOSE WHO

10:51

HEAR THAT ANSWER AND FEEL IT'S

10:53

HYPOCRITICAL TO VOTE ON HIM.

10:54

>> I THINK WE HAVE TO MAKE A

10:55

CHOICE, RIGHT?

10:56

EVERYBODY IS LOOKING AT THEIR

10:58

CANDIDATES AND THEY MAY SAY I

11:00

DON'T LOVE EVERYTHING ABOUT

11:02

THIS, I DISAGREE WITH THIS AND I

11:04

DON'T LIKE WHEN WHEN THEY SAY

11:05

THIS.

11:05

FOR ME WHEN I LOOK AT MY STATE

11:07

OF MICHIGAN AND THE COST OF

11:09

FOOD, THE COST OF RENT, THE COST

11:12

OF INSURANCE THAT I FEEL LESS

11:13

SAFE.

11:14

CRIME IS ON THE RISE, THAT WE'RE

11:17

SEEING FENTANYL COME ACROSS OUR

11:19

BORDER AND OPEN BORDER, I DON'T

11:20

THINK THERE'S ANY CHOICE, BUT TO

11:22

VOTE FOR THE REPUBLICAN EVEN