P. Diddy Trafficking Investigation: Breaking Down The Facts

Law&Crime Network
27 Mar 202448:52

Summary

TLDRThe discussion revolves around the recent raids conducted on homes linked to rapper and entertainment mogul Sean 'Diddy' Combs by Homeland Security, in connection to an ongoing investigation. Despite various civil lawsuits accusing Diddy and others of serious crimes, including sex trafficking and assault, he has not been criminally charged. His associate, Brendan Paul, was arrested for drug possession. Diddy's attorney claims the raids were a 'witch hunt' based on meritless accusations. The conversation delves into the legal implications, potential charges, and the process of gathering and reviewing evidence in such cases.

Takeaways

  • πŸ” The transcript discusses ongoing investigations and raids conducted at properties linked to Sean 'Diddy' Combs by Homeland Security in connection to allegations of sex trafficking, sexual assault, and other serious accusations.
  • 🚨 Diddy has not been criminally charged in relation to these allegations, and the raids were part of evidence-gathering efforts to determine the veracity of the claims made in civil lawsuits.
  • 🏠 The raids took place at homes in Los Angeles and Miami, with the presence of armed personnel and the use of tactics typically reserved for situations where there is a risk of firearms.
  • 🀝 Diddy's attorney, Aaron Dyer, criticized the authorities for the 'excessive show of force and hostility exhibited by authorities' during the raids and described the investigations as a 'witch hunt' based on meritless accusations.
  • πŸ“œ The legal panel discussed the potential for RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) charges if there is sufficient evidence of an organized criminal enterprise, which could carry heavy sentences.
  • πŸ”Ž The involvement of Homeland Security suggests a focus on human trafficking aspects of the case, as they have been increasingly involved in such investigations at the federal level.
  • πŸ€” The panelists questioned the specifics of the allegations, such as the definition of sex trafficking and the roles of different individuals involved, including名人 like Prince Harry, whose connection to Diddy was mentioned in a civil lawsuit but without direct accusations.
  • πŸ“Œ The legal process was discussed, including the potential need for a grand jury to review evidence for an indictment and the possibility of civil claims having criminal bases that can be investigated further.
  • πŸ” The issue of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) was raised, with the panel noting that NDAs cannot cover up criminal activities and that participants in alleged crimes can still be compelled to testify.
  • 🌐 The global community is watching the case closely, with the potential for international implications if Diddy were to flee the country or if there are connections to incidents occurring outside the U.S.

Q & A

  • What triggered the raids on properties linked to Diddy?

    -The raids were conducted by Homeland Security in Los Angeles and Miami as part of an ongoing investigation related to accusations against Diddy, including sex trafficking, sexual assault, rape, and domestic violence.

  • How did Diddy react during the raids?

    -Diddy was reportedly seen pacing back and forth outside of a Miami Airport, accompanied by some family members. He was not detained or arrested but cooperated with authorities.

  • What was the outcome for Diddy's associate following the raids?

    -Diddy's associate, alleged drug mule Brendan Paul, was arrested and charged with possession of cocaine and marijuana.

  • What was Diddy's legal team's response to the raids?

    -Diddy's attorney, Aaron Dyer, criticized the raids as a 'gross overuse of military level force' and described them as part of a 'premature rush to judgment' and a 'witch hunt' based on meritless accusations.

  • Has Diddy been criminally charged in connection to the allegations?

    -As of the latest updates, Diddy has not been criminally charged in connection with any of the allegations. However, several civil lawsuits have been filed accusing him and others of serious crimes.

  • Why was Homeland Security involved in the raids?

    -Homeland Security conducted the raids due to their authority and involvement in investigating human trafficking, which is one of the accusations against Diddy.

  • What is sex trafficking in the context of the allegations against Diddy?

    -Sex trafficking, in this context, involves transporting someone across state lines for the purpose of engaging in sexual misconduct, which is part of the civil allegations against Diddy.

  • Is Prince Harry implicated in any of the lawsuits against Diddy?

    -Prince Harry is mentioned due to his celebrity connection with Diddy, but there is no implication or accusation against him in any criminal or unethical activities related to Diddy's cases.

  • What could Diddy potentially be charged with based on the information known?

    -Based on the civil complaints, Diddy could potentially face charges related to human and sex trafficking, which could carry a sentence of up to 25 years if proven.

  • What determines if a case like Diddy's is federal or state?

    -The nature of the crimes, such as human trafficking which affects interstate commerce and involves federal authorities like Homeland Security, typically determines if a case is federal. The involvement of federal agencies indicates a federal investigation.

Outlines

00:00

πŸš“ Homeland Security Raids Linked to Diddy

Homeland Security conducted raids at properties in Los Angeles and Miami connected to rapper and entertainment mogul Diddy. These actions are part of an investigation led by the Southern District of New York, related to several civil lawsuits accusing Diddy of sex trafficking, sexual assault, and other serious allegations. Despite the raids, Diddy was seen outside a Miami Airport and has not been detained or arrested. His associate, Brendan Paul, however, has been arrested for possession of controlled substances. Diddy's legal representative claims the raids involved excessive force and were part of a prejudiced 'witch hunt' against Diddy, who has not been criminally charged in relation to the allegations.

05:01

πŸ” Legal Analysis of the Diddy Investigation

The investigation surrounding Diddy includes potential charges of sex trafficking, with a focus on the transportation of individuals across state lines for illicit purposes. Legal analysts discuss the nuances of trafficking laws and the potential implications for Diddy. There's speculation about the use of RICO charges due to the organized nature of the alleged crimes. Additionally, the involvement of high-profile names like Prince Harry in the civil lawsuits, although not accused of any wrongdoing, highlights the complex web of associations in high-profile cases. The federal nature of the investigation suggests significant legal hurdles and the potential for serious charges if evidence supports the allegations.

10:03

πŸ€” Public and Legal Reactions to the Raids

The public and legal reactions to the raids on Diddy's properties are mixed, with discussions on the appropriateness of the force used during the operations. Legal experts weigh in on the implications of the raids, the potential charges that could arise, and the evidence that might be sought by authorities. The conversation also touches upon the procedural aspects of federal investigations, including the issuance of search warrants and the potential timeline for charges. The role of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) and the legal obligations of individuals aware of criminal activities are also examined, highlighting the complexities of high-profile legal battles.

15:04

πŸ“Ή Impact of Evidence and Legal Proceedings

The discussion delves into the potential impact of the evidence collected during the raids, including electronic devices and possible video recordings. The timing and coordination of federal raids are analyzed, along with the implications of any evidence that may implicate other celebrities or associates of Diddy. The conversation also explores the potential legal defenses and the challenges faced by the prosecution in high-profile cases involving numerous witnesses and complex legal issues. The importance of corroborating evidence and the role of civil lawsuits in shaping criminal investigations are emphasized, providing insight into the legal strategies that might be employed by both sides.

20:05

πŸ”Ž Scrutiny of Diddy's Legal and Social Circle

This segment examines the scrutiny surrounding Diddy's social and legal circle, particularly focusing on the involvement of his associates and family members in the allegations. Legal analysts discuss the potential liabilities for those aware of or participating in the alleged crimes, drawing parallels to other high-profile cases. The conversation also addresses the public's perception of Diddy's actions and the broader implications for his career and reputation. Questions about the enforcement of NDAs, the handling of evidence, and the possibility of additional victims coming forward are considered, highlighting the ongoing complexity of the case.

25:07

🌐 Broader Implications and Legal Considerations

The broader implications of the investigation into Diddy are discussed, including the potential for charges to be expanded to include other individuals involved in the alleged activities. Legal experts consider the challenges of prosecuting high-profile cases, the role of public opinion, and the impact of celebrity status on legal proceedings. The segment also explores the possible outcomes of the case, including the impact on Diddy's personal and professional life, and the potential for broader conversations about accountability and justice in the entertainment industry.

30:07

πŸ“Œ Concluding Thoughts on the Diddy Investigation

In conclusion, the discussion summarizes the key points of the investigation surrounding Diddy, reflecting on the legal, social, and ethical implications of the case. The importance of due process, the potential for further legal action, and the ongoing public interest in the case are emphasized. The segment underscores the complexity of legal battles involving high-profile figures and the multifaceted nature of the allegations against Diddy. The conversation ends with a call for careful consideration of the evidence and the legal standards required to pursue justice in such high-stakes cases.

Mindmap

Keywords

πŸ’‘Homeland Security

Homeland Security refers to the United States Department of Homeland Security, a federal agency tasked with public security, dealing with terrorism, border security, immigration and customs, cyber security, and disaster prevention and management. In the context of the video, Homeland Security conducted raids on properties linked to the rapper and producer Diddy in Los Angeles and Miami as part of an investigation into allegations of sex trafficking, sexual assault, and other serious crimes. The involvement of Homeland Security indicates the severity and nature of the allegations, suggesting they might involve human trafficking or other activities that fall under the agency's purview.

πŸ’‘Sex trafficking

Sex trafficking is a form of modern slavery involving the exploitation of individuals through coercion, deception, or force for the purpose of sexual exploitation. The script mentions several civil lawsuits accusing Diddy and others of sex trafficking among other crimes, highlighting a significant aspect of the ongoing investigation. This concept is central to understanding the severity of the allegations and the legal implications for those involved, indicating that the activities crossed state lines and potentially involved exploitation for sexual purposes.

πŸ’‘Raids

Raids refer to sudden attacks or incursions by law enforcement into specific locations to search for evidence or apprehend suspects. The video script discusses Homeland Security conducting raids at homes linked to Diddy in Los Angeles and Miami, indicating law enforcement's active pursuit of evidence related to the allegations of sex trafficking and other crimes. These raids are a critical moment in the investigation, representing a tangible action taken by authorities in response to the accusations.

πŸ’‘Civil lawsuits

Civil lawsuits are legal disputes between individuals or entities where the plaintiff seeks compensation or remedy for damages caused by the defendant's actions. In this context, Diddy faces several civil lawsuits accusing him of sex trafficking, sexual assault, rape, and domestic violence. These lawsuits are significant because they not only publicize the allegations but also may influence public perception and could potentially lead to criminal charges if they provide evidence of illegal activities.

πŸ’‘Cooperation with authorities

This phrase indicates Diddy's response to the law enforcement actions taken against him. Despite the raids on his properties, he was not detained or arrested but cooperated with authorities. This cooperation could involve providing information, allowing searches without resistance, or other forms of assistance to the investigation. It's a crucial detail that illustrates his stance towards the allegations and the ongoing investigation at this stage.

πŸ’‘RICO charges

RICO, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, is a federal law designed to combat organized crime in the United States. The video script suggests that the investigation into Diddy might consider RICO charges, implying that the alleged activities could be part of an organized crime effort, possibly involving a coordinated effort to commit the crimes of which he's accused. This underscores the complexity and severity of the case, suggesting that it's not just about individual acts but potentially about a broader criminal enterprise.

πŸ’‘Excessive force

Excessive force refers to a situation where law enforcement uses more physical force than necessary to conduct an arrest or a raid. Diddy's legal team accused the authorities of using excessive force during the raids on his properties, framing the law enforcement action as overly aggressive and unnecessarily harsh. This accusation introduces a contentious element into the narrative, suggesting that the raids might have been conducted in a way that could be seen as intimidating or disproportionate to the need to collect evidence.

πŸ’‘Electronic evidence

Electronic evidence includes any data or information stored on electronic devices that could be relevant to a legal case. In the video script, the collection of electronics during the raids suggests that investigators are looking for digital evidence, such as communications, videos, or documents that could support the allegations against Diddy. The mention of electronic evidence highlights the modern aspect of criminal investigations, where digital data can play a crucial role in building a case.

πŸ’‘NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement)

An NDA is a legally binding contract that ensures certain information remains confidential. Within the context of the allegations against Diddy, NDAs might have been used to prevent individuals from speaking out about their experiences. However, the script clarifies that criminal activities cannot be protected by NDAs, meaning that if the allegations involve crimes, those agreements would not prevent investigation or prosecution. This detail is crucial for understanding how legal mechanisms are navigated in cases involving powerful individuals and sensitive accusations.

πŸ’‘Probable cause

Probable cause is a legal standard that requires a reasonable basis for believing that a crime may have been committed, which is necessary for obtaining warrants for raids or arrests. In the script, the concept of probable cause underpins the justification for the raids conducted on Diddy's properties, suggesting that authorities had sufficient evidence to believe that searching those locations would yield evidence relevant to their investigation. This concept is fundamental in ensuring that law enforcement actions are grounded in evidence rather than mere suspicion.

Highlights

Homeland Security conducted searches on properties linked to rapper-producer Diddy in Los Angeles and Miami as part of an ongoing investigation by the southern district of New York.

The raids were conducted amid several civil lawsuits accusing Diddy and others of sex trafficking, sexual assault, rape, and domestic violence.

Diddy was reportedly seen pacing outside a Miami Airport during the raids but was not detained or arrested.

Diddy's associate, alleged drug mule Brendan Paul, was arrested for possession of cocaine and marijuana.

Attorney Aaron Dyer responded to the raids, criticizing the excessive use of force and calling the investigation a 'witch hunt' based on meritless accusations.

Diddy has not been criminally charged in connection with any of the allegations, and one of the lawsuits was already settled while others are ongoing.

The legal analyst Brian Buckmire and retired FBI agent Colin Schmidt joined the discussion to provide insights into the legal and investigative aspects of the case.

Homeland Security's involvement in the raids is attributed to their expanded role in investigating human trafficking due to their connection to the border.

The discussion highlighted the difference between human trafficking and the more specific sex trafficking, emphasizing the transportation aspect and participation in sexual misconduct.

The potential charges Diddy could face, including those under RICO, and the possible sentences if found guilty were discussed, with a focus on the civil complaints as the basis for potential criminal charges.

The question of whether Diddy's homes should have been raided, given they are in his daughter's name and the name of the record company, was addressed, with considerations of probable cause and safety.

The legality of NDAs in relation to criminal acts was discussed, clarifying that NDAs cannot cover up crimes and that victims can still cooperate with law enforcement even if they have signed NDAs.

The possibility of Diddy fleeing the country was addressed, with speculation that he might have left the country or is hiding, but no concrete evidence was provided.

The potential for other celebrities to be pursued in the investigation was discussed, emphasizing the high probability of pursuit if there are allegations involving minors or other criminal activities.

The process of gathering evidence through search warrants and the potential for subsequent arrests based on the evidence found was explained, highlighting the strategic nature of such law enforcement actions.

The discussion touched on the potential defense strategies for Diddy, including the argument that the travel involved in the alleged trafficking did not constitute a violation if the participants went willingly.

The issue of privacy and consent in relation to video recordings made by Diddy was raised, questioning the legal implications of such recordings and their admissibility as evidence.

The potential impact of the case on Diddy's life and reputation was discussed, with considerations of the possibility of legal action against the government if the investigation does not lead to charges.

The possibility of Diddy's son being implicated in the case was addressed, with a focus on the evidence needed for a case against him in relation to the allegations made in the civil lawsuit.

The discussion concluded with speculation on the timeline for the review of evidence collected during the raids and the potential for future developments in the case.

Transcripts

00:00

sea Diddy comes more specifically the

00:03

raids that have been conducted at homes

00:05

linked to the rapper producer

00:06

entertainment Mogul if you're new to the

00:08

story Homeland Security they conducted

00:10

these searches on these properties in

00:12

Los Angeles and Miami reporting

00:14

indicates that this is in connection to

00:15

an ongoing investigation through the

00:17

southern district of New York now the

00:19

raids came amid several different civil

00:22

lawsuits filed in recent months accusing

00:24

the rapper and others of sex trafficking

00:26

sexual assault rape domestic violence it

00:28

goes on and on it's absolutely horrific

00:30

but around the time of these raids Diddy

00:32

was reportedly last seen pacing back and

00:35

forth outside of a Miami Airport there

00:37

was a video that circulated this he was

00:39

accompanied by some family members now

00:40

at the time the 54-year-old rapper was

00:43

not detained he cooperated with

00:45

authorities he was not arrested let's

00:47

make that clear uh however I should tell

00:49

you in the latest development Diddy's

00:51

associate alleged drug mule Brendan Paul

00:54

was arrested in charge but with

00:56

possession of cocaine and marijuana now

00:58

coles's attorney Aaron Dyer responded to

01:01

the raids yesterday saying quote

01:03

yesterday there was a gross overuse of

01:05

military level Force as search warrants

01:07

were executed at Mr colm's residences

01:10

there is no excuse for the excessive

01:12

show of force and hostility exhibited by

01:14

authorities or the way his children and

01:16

employees were treated Dyer went on to

01:19

say that the raids were quote a

01:20

premature rush to Judgment of Mr Colmes

01:23

that is nothing more than a Witch Hunt

01:25

based on meritless accusations made in

01:27

civil lawsuits there has been no finding

01:29

of criminal activity or civil liability

01:31

with any of those allegations Mr Colmes

01:34

is innocent and will continue to fight

01:36

every single day to clear his day his

01:38

name now remember Colmes has not been

01:40

criminally charged in connection with

01:42

any of these allegations one of those

01:43

lawsuits was already settled the other

01:45

ones are still ongoing so that is

01:46

correct there has been no uh he's not

01:49

been found guilty of anything he's not

01:50

been charged there is no civil liability

01:52

yet but as the story develops we are

01:54

going to bring you the very latest and

01:56

there's a lot to get into in the

01:57

meantime we are going to dive into this

01:59

live chat live Q&A for the rest of the

02:01

hour again Facebook X YouTube submit

02:04

your questions we'll bring them on the

02:05

air now to help me answer this you don't

02:07

want to just hear from me I am joined by

02:09

La crime legal analyst Brian buckmire

02:11

who's right here in studio with me and

02:14

retired FBI agent Colin Schmidt out of

02:16

Los Angeles we're gonna get right to it

02:18

gentlemen good to see you um first of

02:20

all Colin were you anywhere near the

02:22

raids in La I think I should ask you

02:24

that first and has your traffic been

02:27

interrupted in any way no no I'm in

02:30

Southwest Riverside County so I wasn't

02:32

down there and that that neighborhood's

02:33

a little bit above my uh my income level

02:36

okay well let me ask you this so we have

02:38

a question now this is from chocolo and

02:41

I'm gonna say this I'm gonna mess up

02:42

these names a lot it's the first step is

02:44

admitting it I'm gonna mess up these

02:45

names a lot chocolo ate milk from

02:49

YouTube H FBI I thought this was

02:51

Homeland Security that rated Diddy's

02:53

Mansions because their specialty is

02:55

investigating human trafficking I throw

02:57

it to you Colin just a general idea

02:59

about the fact that you had the homeland

03:01

security being the ones who actually

03:03

conducted the

03:05

raid well they have the same authorities

03:07

as the FBI does and based upon uh their

03:11

uh their connection to the border and a

03:13

lot of the things are going on there

03:14

they've gotten uh a lot more involved in

03:17

the human trafficking side of the of the

03:19

crimes that are going on in the country

03:21

and frankly they do a fantastic job and

03:24

obviously they had a lot of resources

03:26

there for a reason and I would be

03:28

interested whenever uh we have that

03:30

opportunity to see the affidavit that

03:32

supports that warrant all right so

03:34

that's I'm glad we cleared that part up

03:36

uh because who conducted it tells us a

03:38

lot about this there's also a

03:39

preliminary question I want to now go to

03:41

Brian about uh this is from Nikki's girl

03:44

from YouTube question is they say it's a

03:46

trafficking case so who is he

03:48

trafficking to I get that he is involved

03:51

however who else is involved it's a

03:52

really good question when we talk about

03:54

what exactly is uh sex trafficking what

03:56

are the elements who would he be

03:58

involved with yeah so human trafficking

04:00

and then the more specific sex

04:02

trafficking is simply transporting

04:04

someone that affects interstate commerce

04:06

usually that's just traveling across

04:08

state lines and participating in sexual

04:11

misconduct in one way shape or form so

04:13

if you look at the Cassie lawsuit or you

04:15

look at the Rodney Jones Jr lawsuit

04:17

where there are civil allegations that

04:19

people were brought across state lines

04:21

for the purpose of of coursing them to

04:23

have sex that would be trafficking it

04:24

would be the individual that you're

04:26

moving from one place to another or the

04:28

person that you're having them engag in

04:30

sexual conduct in that state or that

04:31

area would be the trafficking it's it's

04:33

a little different than what we

04:34

typically think of just someone putting

04:36

another person in in a vehicle and move

04:38

them to another state it's it's the

04:40

sexual activities that occur in the

04:42

different states As you move them from

04:44

one one place to another that's a good

04:45

point I'm glad you broke that down um I

04:47

want to go to Colin for this so this is

04:49

a really good question from an equally

04:51

amazing name it's cats. adct from uh

04:54

YouTube I'm glad you admitted your

04:56

addiction again first step is admitting

04:58

it um the question is Prince Harry named

05:01

in Diddy's lawsuit true or not now I can

05:03

tell you as far as I know Colin in the

05:06

lawsuit they're referring to the little

05:08

Rod Jones lawsuit this is Diddy's former

05:10

producer accused him of sexual assault

05:12

sexual harassment encourage everybody to

05:14

check out the lawsuit this is actually

05:15

the amended lawsuit right here I know it

05:17

seems like a lot but it's actually

05:19

disturbing read to say the least uh my

05:22

understanding is Harry is just is one of

05:24

the people a celebrity name associated

05:26

with Diddy which by the way if I again

05:29

don't think there's any more mention in

05:30

that but I think the bigger issue is

05:32

when you're dealing with high-profile

05:34

cases like this and we said the same

05:35

thing with the galain Maxwell and the

05:37

release of all those documents you're

05:38

going to hear names doesn't mean they're

05:40

implicated in any way or they're

05:42

criminally responsible in any way it's

05:43

just a connection a celebrity connection

05:46

to Diddy what's your take on it because

05:48

Federal authorities have to be very

05:49

careful and sensitive to who is

05:51

discussed in these kinds of

05:54

Investigations well I think a lot of

05:55

times the they'll put uh names in there

05:59

I mean that that it's truthful I mean

06:00

they have to swear to the affidavit but

06:02

make it even more salacious to get more

06:04

attention I it's unlikely Prince Harry

06:07

had anything to do with this uh he was

06:09

just it's from what I understand uh from

06:11

my the news reports he just attended a

06:13

party and he was just listed in lawsuit

06:15

as just one of the attendees but there

06:17

was absolutely no uh no inclination or

06:21

no accusation against him or anybody

06:24

that's in his Circle I will tell you if

06:27

it comes out that Diddy or anybody in

06:28

his inner circle are ultimately charged

06:30

with the worst of crimes that we're

06:31

talking about here you know sex

06:33

trafficking charges then it goes into a

06:35

conversation like we had with the

06:36

Weinstein case or even the Epstein case

06:39

was this just known and never discussed

06:42

was this just known and nobody came

06:43

forward those are going to be some tough

06:45

questions but we're not at that point

06:47

yet but Brian I go to you now because

06:48

this is actually two questions that I

06:50

think are equally important one is from

06:52

D from YouTube well first let me do this

06:54

one this is the expat exchange from

06:57

YouTube based on the information known

06:59

What charges is Diddy likely to be hit

07:02

with Rico and then I'll also throw this

07:04

one for me this is D from YouTube what's

07:07

the sentence if charged and found guilty

07:10

so let me put it this way we don't know

07:13

anything about the investigation in this

07:15

case we know that it's it's sex

07:16

trafficking and we are connecting the

07:18

dots as best as we can and looking at

07:21

the Civil uh complaints from the five

07:23

different people one being Cassandra

07:25

Ventura her name also is is Cassie that

07:27

one settled so we look at the other four

07:29

so if I was a betting person looking at

07:31

those civil complaints I'm saying that

07:34

I'm looking at Rodney Jones's and we're

07:35

talking Rico because he alleges Rico

07:37

charges in his civil complaint as well

07:40

as the human and sex trafficking uh

07:42

Federal charge that one uh if I'm

07:45

correct I'm going to double check it I

07:46

think it's 18 USC

07:48

1591 that has an ultimate sentence of up

07:51

to 25 years in prison now the other

07:53

thing you have to think about is if

07:54

you're believing the allegations of

07:56

Rodney Jones to be true and there are

07:58

multiple allegations of traffic tring

08:00

there's a potential for multiple charges

08:01

of trafficking so it could be one charge

08:04

of human trafficking which is 25 years

08:06

or it could be multiple that are

08:08

sentenced consecutively so right now

08:10

it's speculation but you'll look to the

08:11

Civil complaints and that's you and I'm

08:13

glad let's also make it clear these are

08:15

civil complaints these are accusations

08:17

that make up a civil lawsuit having said

08:20

that you could have behavior that is

08:22

overlaps right have Behavior that's

08:24

civil but also part of the criminal

08:25

Arena but these are civil allegations

08:28

well the the complaint is civil correct

08:30

but what they are accusing in the

08:32

conduct and even in the Civil complaint

08:34

they are criminal statutes corre yes and

08:36

so you can take as we've seen and I'm

08:38

not drawing the comparison to say that

08:40

Shan comes is like these people I'm just

08:42

saying that the process is similar right

08:44

you can draw comparisons between Harvey

08:45

Weinstein who had civil cases that

08:47

turned criminal R Kelly Jeffrey Epstein

08:50

you can have civil claims that have

08:52

criminal bases that someone can

08:53

investigate and move forward on so uh

08:56

Colin let me move it over to you we have

08:58

Danny Q from YouTube uh what determines

09:01

if this case is federal or state Rico I

09:04

mean we know it seems to be a federal

09:06

investigation uh Homeland Security as we

09:08

talked about was a part of it so how do

09:10

we know or what makes it something

09:11

Federal versus

09:13

State well uh obviously the HSI went

09:17

ahead and did the raids and the the

09:19

concept of Rico gets thrown around a lot

09:21

it doesn't get charged very often

09:22

because there's a very high bar to prove

09:25

Rico and basically a Rico is an

09:27

Enterprise of two or more people that

09:29

are engag Eng in specified unlawful Acts

09:31

or criminal activity that's been

09:32

identified in the statute as and and and

09:35

obviously human trafficking is

09:37

identified there so what he's going to

09:39

be charged with if at all because he is

09:41

innocent till proven guilty we don't

09:43

know I mean that was the purpose of that

09:45

search warrant is HSI going in there

09:47

Gathering all the evidence and I'm sure

09:49

they're out doing lots and lots of

09:50

interviews and then if there is indeed

09:52

victims ATT attached to this uh as in

09:55

people that were human trafficked

09:56

they're going to be talking to all them

09:58

and wrapping this up and then I think

10:00

this will come to a head quite quickly

10:02

because of all of the media tension

10:04

that's swirling around let me ask you my

10:06

own question about that Colin a lot of

10:08

people have been wondering why were

10:10

charges not in conjunction with the raid

10:13

why did an indictment arrest happen in

10:16

conjunction with the raid if you can

10:18

explain

10:19

that well it might be because they're

10:21

relying on those complaints that are in

10:23

those civil lawsuits as well as some

10:25

other uh issues or things that determine

10:27

probable cause so so the bottom line is

10:30

that the US attorney's office especially

10:32

in Los Angeles is not going to charge

10:34

someday unless they feel confident

10:37

that're they're going they have uh

10:39

evidence Beyond A Reasonable Doubt so I

10:42

think the bottom line here is the uh

10:44

investigators want to gather everything

10:46

the prosecutors that are associated with

10:48

this they don't want to pull the trigger

10:49

too soon because they want to make sure

10:51

they get this right the first time

10:52

because you only get one chance

10:54

otherwise if you go too quickly uh they

10:57

might have to dismiss counts or not

10:59

arrest him at all uh Brian want to turn

11:02

this next question over to you by the

11:03

way you can get your questions in on

11:05

Facebook YouTube X Twitter get them any

11:09

which way you can all right so let's go

11:11

to this question this is from JT baller

11:13

3 from YouTube do we get access to all

11:16

the information presented in federal

11:18

cases or not I know there's no video

11:20

interesting because let's say an

11:21

indictment were to come out today or

11:23

tomorrow um what would be our level what

11:26

would our access be to those documents

11:28

what would we know well if the stny is

11:30

running an investigation in coordination

11:33

the southern district of New York is

11:34

running investigation in coordination

11:36

with Miami as well as uh Los Angeles

11:39

typically what they do when they do have

11:40

an indictment they post on their social

11:42

media specifically X or their own

11:44

website and they'll put out uh a blurb

11:46

of what the allegations are and what

11:48

they're charging this is me looking in

11:50

it in the future if Sean Colmes is

11:52

indicted so you might get that blurb in

11:53

some information we may also get an

11:56

indictment but if that information is

11:58

not presented to

12:59

reporting that that wasn't his Gulf

13:00

Stream and there's reporting that he

13:02

flew out of the country and then there's

13:04

reporting that he's in uh Miami right

13:06

now so it's really at that early stage

13:10

where everybody's making assumptions and

13:12

uh kind of uh kind of trying to fill in

13:14

the blanks um this is going to shake out

13:17

very very quickly and uh frankly

13:19

somebody of the stature of Mr Colmes I

13:23

mean it's it would be tough for him to

13:25

to hide anywhere in the world if if he

13:27

indeed wants to hide well

13:29

if he also goes to a country that

13:31

doesn't have extradition I'm sure that

13:33

would obviously complicate situations

13:35

although I want to now ask you Colin

13:37

followup question about the raid itself

13:39

received a lot of controversy I would

13:41

say Obviously from Diddy's legal team

13:44

they say that this was like a military

13:45

effort it was excessive we have a

13:48

question from wheelie Pete from YouTube

13:51

should his homes have been allowed to be

13:52

raided given that they were in his

13:54

daughter's name and the name of the

13:56

record company now again I I can't

13:58

confirm if that that ownership is

14:00

correct but assuming it is even so you

14:02

talk about the the what was used there

14:05

um you know we had armed Personnel

14:07

coming in people were placed in

14:09

handcuffs outside quite the presence

14:12

walk us through if you think it was

14:14

appropriate well just unpack that

14:17

question a little bit the first thing is

14:18

using a SWAT team is what they use there

14:21

uh might even been bork with the which

14:23

is the border patrol their tactical

14:26

Group which is phenomenal group The

14:29

bottom line is they were going to go

14:30

through probably a checklist of reasons

14:32

why they would use a tactical response

14:35

and the number one reason they would is

14:37

they may have gotten information that

14:39

there's firearms in the house and if

14:42

that's the case they want to certainly

14:44

uh use whatever resources they they have

14:46

to make sure everybody is safe also

14:48

based upon the size of that uh estate y